Criticism of the GUM

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Anti-GUM poster used by Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy's campaign for election as vice-chair in the Konmalehth.

Criticism of the Grand Unified Micronational (GUM) has encompassed numerous arguments regarding various aspects of the organisation, such as policy, ideological bias,[1] administration, purpose,[2] and the ability to enforce rulings.[3][4]

Modern criticism includes claims that the GUM is a YAMO (in spite of its longevity), elitist or useless and does not do much,[2][5] also claiming that it would not benefit their micronation if they joined.[3] Historically, there has also been criticism made over the GUM recognising aspects of micronational warfare, such as the Austenasian Civil War. The GUM was formerly heavily involved in mediation between disputes over Antarctic claims, which was also a point of criticism.

History of criticism

Since the GUM was established in 2009, it has been subject to constant criticism in one way or another. Many terms have been used to describe frequent critics of the GUM, such as 'Anti-GUM',[3] 'GUM-skeptic'[6] or arguably the most widely used term coined by Messenger 'contraGUMism'.[7]

Historical criticism

From 2009 to 2012, the GUM was subject to criticism from several micronationalists.[8][9][10]

Criticism has come from such people as Gordon Freeman[11] and Heinrich Schneider, mostly about the policies on professionalism held by the GUM. They argued that micronations being constrained or condemned for being non-serious or unprofessional is against their idea of micronationalism being whatever its creators want, pointing to such famous micronations as the Republic of Molossia, one of the most famous and respected micronations in the world,[12] having non-serious characteristics, such as describing themselves as a 'dictatorial banana-republic'[13] and waging war against the defunct state of East Germany since 2 November 1983.[14]

This criticism was refuted by GUM members on multiple occasions, using examples of GUM member states Juclandia counting toys as citizens and Wyvern waging an annual "fireworks war" against the Netherlands - they countered the example of Molossia by pointing out that despite its tongue-in-cheek domestic features it is known for acting very professionally in regards to its interactions with other nations. The GUM attempted to encourage formality in intermicronational relations (something which has been supported by most members of the MicroWiki community several times),[15] and criticised instances when a member state acted in an uncharacteristically informal manner, such as when the then King Håkon of Zealandia announced an alleged "coup" by posting a short video in which he pretended to be a character with a comical voice and fake dreadlocks, and then refused to impart further information on the event.[16] There is no record of the GUM having ever attempted to directly interfere in a nation's domestic affairs, but the organisation did encourage foreign affairs and diplomacy to be conducted in an appropriately formal fashion and expected member states to act relatively professionally on the intermicronational stage.

The GUM was also criticised by members of the MicroWikia community and its then-biggest intermicronational organisation the World Union, for the abusive actions that individual members took against its website and their hostile attitude to the generally younger user base of the wiki, a problem in the GUM which was around for a few years.

2016

On 3 July 2016, Sandus's application to join was rejected by the Quorum, as Sandus was a signatory of the Denton Protocol.[1] Zealandia later announced they would not seek membership, stating: "If this is how they treat a signatory of the Denton Protocol, then I'm deeply concerned about how they may react to a nation whose whole acting collective executive and majority of the population are transgender".[17] Sandus later complained in a statement that Wyvern was accepted despite having a "history of racist and Islamophobic hatred".[18] However a few days later on 18 July, Sandus announced it would no longer adhere to the Denton Protocol.[19]

Modern criticism

On 23 May 2019, a micronation called Empire of Lehmark made headlines when it was accepted as an observer state, despite having claimed Earth. The claim was previously not public knowledge. Adam I, Chair of the GUM at the time, said Lehmark would be expelled unless they retracted their claims.[20]

On 3 July 2019, the National Convention of Mahuset approved a proposal by President Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy to formally prevent any current or future Mahusetan administration from applying to the GUM. The main reason for this was due to recent controversial incidents within its membership.[2]

On 29 July 2019, Shiro of Zenrax brought the Great Micronational War to the attention of the GUM (as well as the MicroWiki community) and suggested they try to mediate the conflict. Shiro, admitting his opinion may be biased, sided with Etukan. This was met with heavy criticism, regarding the fact that the so-called "war" was thought by many to not actually be a war, and had elements of mass-pinging and Discord raids, and had other unverified claims. There are claims that Etukan had also supposedly started the conflict. The GUM decided not to take action and stated that the so-called war was "pathetic".[citation needed]

Also in July, the OAM under the leadership of Charles Ross and James Ellis began a campaign to lessen what they perceived to be the GUM's influence over the organisation. During this campaign, both Ross and Ellis (along with other OAM member states) openly criticised the GUM for its bureaucracy and at one point the OAM's government issued a ban on members belonging to both groups (causing an exit of several member states).[21] These attempts to antagonize the GUM mostly failed and upon the OAM's dissolution in August 2019, many of the group's former members joined the GUM.[22]

On 12 January 2020, the Ponderosan legislature voted unanimously to leave[23] after the Chair Thomas Bainbridge suspended Ponderosa Hills's representative Leon Montan after swearing and not using decorum language in the lounge channel. In an earlier press conference, Leon Montan said that Thomas is an "imperialist" and "egomaniac", and that he had banned Leon for "rules that are't applicable",[24] referring to the lobby rules which did not say they apply to the lounge.

On 25 March 2020, Anthony Clark published an opinion article in the Amerston Post arguing that the GUM should allow media access to Quorum.[25]

On 9 April 2020, a safeguarding issue in the GUM erupted into controversy regarding the organisation's response.[26]

On 23 May 2020, during the 2020 New Eiffel general elections, Liberal Egalitarian leader Luke Warren ran a campaign for New Eiffel to leave the GUM due to it " [sic] not being active, been involved with scandals, developed a separate elitist identity, etc." The campaign was not viewed positively and was actively criticised by Labour leader Leon Montan and Independent Party member Jayden Lycon due to Warren imposing a double standard on the GUM compared to other organizations and later Warren apologised.[27]

Responses to criticism

Pro-GUM poster used during the Abeldane GUM membership referendum, 2020

Zabëlle Skye released a comedic song released with a music video about a kid making fun of the Grand Unified Micronational, titled "THE UNITED MICRONATIONS is better",[28] mocking criticism of the GUM and YAMOs, as well as people who take criticism of the GUM too personally. As of 22 October 2020, the video has been viewed more than 170 times. The song later became one of the two national anthems of the Cupertino Alliance on 20 March 2020, "having higher precedence", meaning that it gets to be played first.[29][a] This was however repealed after the passing of the Anthem Act in early June 2020.

In a May 2020 editorial for Messenger, former GUM Chairman Henry Clémens presented a lengthy argument where he both defended the GUM and called for changes to be made within the organization. The article also coined the term contraGUMism.[31] The phrase caught popularity among GUM advocates and critics alike.

In August 2020, James Frisch was cited as saying (in regards to Regelis); "[...] it is not a coincidence that you weren't complaining about the GUM and the criticisms are only coming out after rejection. It's a pattern we've all seen before, you suddenly dislike the GUM only now." Saying that some critiques of the GUM (though not all) only begin to criticise the GUM after having their membership applications rejected.[32]

Public opinion

The MicroWiki General Survey conducted in November 2019 found that out of 34 respondents, 47.1% found the GUM "positive", 5.9% found it "negative", 8.8% said it was neither, and 38.2% had "no opinion" on the GUM.[33] The 2020 installation of the survey in November found that out of 63 respondents, 9.5% found it was "strongly positive", 33.3% found it "positive", while 25.4% found it "negative" and 9.5% found it "strongly negative". 22.2% had "no opinion". In contrast, the GUM was in last place in the March 2020 Dime-Curio Micronational Organisation Poll, which had 18 respondents, with a score of 4.92 out of a possible 10.[34]

Anti-GUM extremist acts

20 alt-accounts[35] by the users OIMGov (Lord Hasan Çakar of Hasanistan) and Mahuset (Emiel Hardy)[36] were banned for vandalism on 26 January 2020. Most of them replaced articles of several micronations with offensive and satirical pro-EU[37] and pro-GUM messages,[38] leading the GUM to intervene (though not directly against the wiki vandalism) later suspending Hasanistan's observership. Despite confessing to the vandalism in private messages and being identified by their IP addresses, the perpetrators publicly maintain their innocence and have attempted to blame Thomas Bainbridge for the vandalism, for which there is no evidence.[39]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Sandum GUM Application Rejected. sandus.org. Accessed 3 July 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 National Convention of 2019 votes to prevent Mahuset from seeking GUM membership. Courant van Lazia. Accessed 3 July 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Eden, Horatio (28 December 2017) Quorum of Delegates to be Relaxed. Abeldane Telegraph. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  4. ↑ http://www.dailymicronational.com/grand-unified-micronational/gum-again-fails-to-consider-gcp-accords/
  5. ↑ GUM fails to convene to deliberate on GCP accords. Daily Micronational. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  6. ↑ GUM-skeptic on MicroWikiDictionary. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  7. ↑ Clémens, Henry (10 May 2020) A comprehensive defense of the Grand Unified Micronational. Messenger. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  8. ↑ 'GUM talk page exchange between Gordon Freeman and Robert Lethler', 16 November 2009
  9. ↑ 'GUM criticised for voting procedures'[dead link] A1 News Service, 27 July 2010
  10. ↑ 'GUM under fire as Anderson admits leaking logs',[dead link] A1 News Service, 31 August 2012
  11. ↑ Micronationalism is serious business, A1 News Service, 5 September 2011. Archived from the original on 26 November 2011.
  12. ↑ 'Lonely Planet' Explores Micronations, National Public Radio, 1 November 2006
  13. ↑ 10 of the world's most bizarre micronations, the Republic of Molossia, The Telegraph. 16 February 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  14. ↑ "The War with East Germany". Molossia.org. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
  15. ↑ 'Suits and ties.',[dead link] MicroWiki Forum, 16-31 May 2011
  16. ↑ 'Olof Olofsson reporting', The Zealandian Gazette, 4 February 2012
  17. ↑ Zealandia Will Not Seek to Join GUM. sandus.org. Accessed 3 July 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  18. ↑ Palace Releases Statement on Failed GUM application. sandus.org. Accessed 3 July 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  19. ↑ Sandus will no Longer Adhere to Denton Protocol. sandus.org. Accessed 18 July 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  20. ↑ Campbell, Will (23 May 2019) Empire claiming whole Earth wins GUM observership. The Glastieven. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  21. ↑ Organisation of Active Micronations. Archived from the original
  22. ↑ Lytexit? Lyteran Politicians Suggest Leaving the OAM. The Royal Lyteran News. Published 9 July 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2020. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019.
  23. ↑ Montan, Leon (12 Jan 2020) Ponderosa Hills leaves the the Grand Unified Micronational. news.ponderosangovernment.ml. Retrieved 12 January 2020
  24. ↑ Montan, Leon (12 Jan 2020) Ponderosa Hills suspends it's delegation to the Grand Unified Micronational. news.ponderosangovernment.ml. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  25. ↑ Clark, Anthony (25 Mar 2020) Why can’t we see inside Quorum?. Amerston Post. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  26. ↑ Shirkel, Jonathan (11 April 2020). The GUM's levels of internal drama will kill it at this pace. ANN. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  27. ↑ Lycon, Jayden (23 May 2020) New Eiffel Decision 2020: An interview with Labour, Liberal Egalitarian, and Right Hand Nacre by Cupertino. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  28. ↑ GUM DIS TRACK - “THE UNITED MICRANATIONS is better" (3 January 2020) on YouTube. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  29. ↑ Lycon, Jayden (19 March 2020) Meet your new anthems: GUM Distrack and Is Jacking Off a Sport?
  30. ↑ Lycon, Jayden (22 March 2020) Ministerial Order enacted, 22 March 2020
  31. ↑ Clémens, Henry (10 May 2020). A comprehensive defense of the Grand Unified Micronational. Messenger. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  32. ↑ Skye, Zabëlle (12 Aug 2020). Regelis still wants to join the GUM after critical remarks after application rejection. Journal en Eiffel. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
  33. ↑ Z. Smith. MicroWiki General Survey results. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  34. ↑ J. Lycon. & Z. Smith. (4 March 2020) Dime-Curio Micro Organization Poll | March 2020
  35. ↑ Archived Block List from MicroWiki on the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  36. ↑ Skye, Zabëlle (3 Feb 2020). "Quorum, 30th January 2020". GUM News. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  37. ↑ Vandals vandalism Samizdat's MicroWiki pages. Accessed 26 January 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  38. ↑ Chkaya, Babou (26 Jan 2020) Court opens investigation against MicroWiki after wave of vandalism. Occitan Sun. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  39. ↑ Mahusetan Intelligence Agency: Thomas Bainbridge likely associated with surge of vandalism. Courant van Lazia. Accessed 1 February 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.

Notes

  1. ↑ Though Is Jacking Off a Sport? was also elected, the anthem was later repealed under a Ministerial Order.[30]

See also

External links

Retrieved from "https://micronations.wiki/index.php?title=Criticism_of_the_GUM&oldid=1836274"