Foreign relations of New Europe
The Empire of New Europe maintains relations with all members of the O.U.M., and recognises most other micronations. New Europe upon discovering a new micronation or secession movement recognizes them automatically unless they claim a large or major part of New Europe's claimed territory.
|Country||Formal relations Began||Notes|
|Burkland||November 26, 2011||Formal relations have recently been established.|
|Eniarku||June 11, 2011||Relations between them are close because both countries have been united and are formal allies.|
|Gishabrun||Relations are considered poor due to New European opinions on how the dispute with Havnesgade-Amager was handled by Gishabrun while representing the OAM.|
|Havnesgade-Amager||No formal relations are established. New Europe and Havnesgade-Amager had a brief dispute over the territory of Connecticut.|
|Kozuc||November 26, 2011||Informal relations have been established with a formal treaty being drawn up.|
|Vikesland||No formal relations are established.|
|Molossia||No formal relations are established.|
|Secundomia||No formal relations are established.|
|Ultamiya||June 11, 2011||Full informal relations established and limited formal relations from July 2011.|
|Tiana||June 15, 2011||Informal relations have been established.|
|Valnor||June 16, 2011||Relations between them are close because both countries are formal allies.|
|Westsylvania||No formal relations are established.|
|Country||Formal relations Began||Notes|
(informal friendly relations only)
|June 15, 2011||Relations between them are close because both countries have been allied in the past. Austenasia and New Europe have a history of helping each other diplomatically with each others endeavours.|
|Domanglia||November 26, 2011||Informal relations have been establsihed.|
|Dorzhabad||June 11, 2011||Informal relations have been establsihed.|
|St.Charlie||June 11, 2011||Relations are considered poor due to a lack of communication between New Europe and St. Charlie since New European Re-establishment.|
|Francisville||March, 2009||Relations are considered poor due to a lack of communication between New Europe and Francisville since New European Re-establishment. Relations were however strong in the past.|
Republic of Lakotah
On December 19, 2007 the Lakota people declared independence from the United States. At this time there is no knowledge of any armed action planned by the Lakota to secure their independence. New Europe has written to Lakotah expressing support for their movement and received a reply with helpful tips for future New European cultural developments.
Republic of New Afrika
There are no formal relations between New Europe and New Afrika. New Europe contacted New Afrika to discuss the possibility of future relations, this is still not yet confirmed by each government. The two governments did negotiate a border dispute that ceded part of the South Carolinian coast line to New Europe.
Governments in Exile
New Europe currently has no relations with any governments in exile, the government does recognize them as the legitimate ruler or ruling authority rather than the one currently in power.
- Belarusian National Republic
- Imperial State of Iran
- Ethiopian Empire
- Republic of South Ossetia
- State of Palestine
- Tradition und Leben (A German monarchist organization, only recognizes H.I.R.H. Georg Friedrich as German Emperor)
- Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
New Europe seeks diplomatic relations with governments in exile, but is currently not attempting to engage in any.
New Europe does its best to investigate all White Nationalist groups an organizations. If the group is proven to be a racist organization New Europe will not associate with them and citizens who do have their citizenship revoked. Currently there are only two groups that New Europeans are allowed to be part of.
New Europe constantly looks into White Nationalist forums as well and has found only one. The only forum used by New Europeans is the only acception to the "Guilty by Association" law. The reason being is because the forum does not allow white supremacist ideas and opinions posted on it. But New Europeans who use this forum are expected to present a copy of their postings and topics from it once a month.
New Europe has recently adopted an anti-radical policy towards all micronations. This policy simply means that micronations who seek to spread their ideology by any means will not receive recognition from New Europe. This policy accepts micronations shifting ideologies if they are democratically conducted.
New Europe has similar if not the same requirements for diplomatic relations as any other micronation. The requirements are as follows:
- Have a solid government
- A permanent population of 3 citizens or more
- A reasonable territory claim (no global or interplanetary claims are accepted)
|Foundation||Constitution • Federalism • Ethnic nationalism • Monarchism|
|State Organs||Monarchy • Imperial Government • Chancellor • Cabinet • Reichstag • State Governments (Illinois • Falia • Connecticut • South Carolina • Ohio)|
|Political parties||Freedom Party of New Europe • Liberty Party|
|Government Policy||Foreign • Social • Military|
|Other Topics||Soldier First Class Productions • Amero • New Europe's attitude towards White Supremacism • Flags and Symbols of New Europe|