Talk:Reddit Nation

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 2020

Rampant Editorialism?

One section is highly editorialised and without citations.

  • ```Reddit Nation was highly criticised from the MicroWiki Sector, with observers of the nation citing that the idea was "Stupid" and "Unrealistic". ``` The quotations here are without a source and should be deleted ASAP.

This article in itself might as well be deleted tbh, unless anyone from Reddit Nation can update it. Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Zed Zabëlle  My Talk Page  Contribs  10:05 pm (21:05), 9 May 2020 (BTS; UTC+1)

I'm willing to update it as a member of The Reddit Nation, we have recently revived in earnest -- just wondering about removing some of the more say...negative...elements of this page. Template:Thesdeej 8:41 pm (10:41), 11 May 2020 (BTS; UTC+11)

I've added a few more references. --Stub (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Enoch's innocence isn't proved, cd rom was against cat so it would make sense for cd to ally with enoch --Stub (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

This addition has been unsubstantiated. Please only include sections that have been supported with screenshots or relevant threads. I'm not sure who you are Stub but I have been a part of TRN since the early days (check discord logs and reddit threads) and know this history quite thoroughly whilst I doubt that you were or are still involved. The Sdeej 23:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I think that the article has a decent amount of citations. The link to the discord is on the article so anyone can check for themselves. Please tell me what sections you feel are inaccurate and I'll happily edit them or discuss them further. --Stub (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Did Enoch ban everyone?

In the article,

"On the 2nd of December, Cat banned Juve, Justinas, and Enoch for trolling. These users were some of the most active, however they had been arguing with Cat, and wanted TRN to ally with China and deny their human right violations. Cat also accused Enoch of mass banning over a dozen innocent users, which Enoch and cd-r0m later denied."

However the screenshot is the evidence that in fact the bans were real however Enoch has been scapegoated (with doctored ban photos) for them and not responsible for them, thus the allegations were never proven and are in fact allegations, hence the quotations marks about the word evidence. I appreciate not going towards an edit war but what you've written is revisionist and lacks any evidence to support your claim. The evidence you have provided does not show that Enoch and cd-r0m deny the claims, it does in fact show that people have intent to frame Enoch. This article is written with the intent to cast a bad light onto Enoch and I believe the previous revision was justified.

Cd-r0m was against Cat so it would make sense for cd to deny the banning incident. This means that you can't prove the screenshot was faked. Additionally, you can read the old server and see where everyone was freaking out about Enoch banning people. Also, instead of putting quotation marks around the word evidence, you could just note that Enoch said the screenshot was faked, as this is far more neutral. --Stub (talk) 10:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)