Talk:Christina I, Summi Imperatoria of Cycoldia

Imperatoria

IMPERATRIX is the female term. reeeeeee--President William Wilson, Archduke of Wilson (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Imperatrix is the direct translation of Empress, while Imperatoria is for the feminine use of the word "Imperator". So the word Imperatrix or Imperatoria would both be acceptable due to the masculine and feminine use of Latin. So while directly translating the word "Empress" you would be correct, that is not what my title is. My title is essentially "Female Emperor" so it is the same in usage although the direct translation is different. --Summi Imperatoris (talk) 13:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Actually, no. Imperatoria is the Feminine Nominative(Vocative and Ablative) case of Imperatoris, which means "relating to the emperor" (imperatoris) and "relating to the empress" (imperatoria). Both of which are adjectives and not nouns, which are used in titles. However, the male noun/title Imperator, which you did use, has its Female Nominative and Vocative case as Imperatrix. Imperatrix, as compared to Imperatoria, is "the female ruler of an empire" rather than "relating to the empress". Just make sure to check cases and uses of terms next time. :D --President William Wilson, Archduke of Wilson (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I am going to triple check with my Latin Teacher.--Christina I of Cycoldia (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Spicy

This (Golly Gosh) is getting real ;) --A chap from Phokland (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

I added disputed

I added disputed not because I am bias but because of the opposite. The truth is that your reign in Ela'r'oech is disputed and so this page must reflect it. Your stance with insisting everything your way IS biased. Deal with it. AniqrSufyan9Chancellor (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• To reply to this, you seem to both actually be bias, unlike said, nor understand that formatting properly used, as well the page Charles Madgett does not include the disputed tag on it with the such, and the page that is linked clarifies this in it's entirety. If you want evidence of your current bias regarding this, I may show you to the edit on Nowellian Ela'r'oech (now a deleted page) where you added an edit saying "To hell with this. Can't you just back down Christina?" and you having said as well about the Government led by Bryce Smith "The puppet government Cycoldia has installed shall be removed.", I think that this all both qualifies enough of bias and the reason why I reverted the edit. Thank you for your time. --𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 15:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Blanking of redirect

I have blanked the page Christina I, Summi Imperatoria of Cycoldia as I will not abide by the naming convention it has forced. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 08:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

You're bound to follow the rules. No one above the rules. --Oritsu.me (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Native Name

The use of Christina Hamilton Nowell in the native name section is since I am cited as Christina Nowell on other pages, and there is no section for "Names" as seen on the Elizabeth II article as cited. If there was a names section such as in that one then I would agree that Christina Hamilton Nowell instead should go there, for clarification. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't know if there is an area for that in the code btw, just saying that if there is not that section then I think the native name area can be used as a replacement with it, really wondering on if there is a section, is it used elsewhere? @Cookieman1.1.1: 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

"Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; 21 April 1926 – 8 September 2022)" Details are bold. A name section doesn't need to be added, there is no need to elaborate why anyone is named what they are its pointless. Where your name outside of your capacity as monarch should always be displayed in the first sentence of the article. I.E: "Christina I & II (Christina Hamilton Nowell, born 6 May 2005)" --aidan does not speak melayu (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm specifically referring to how the article does have her name in the infobox under the section "Names". Seeing at this section does not exist in the infobox being used there I don't see why the native name section wouldn't be able to be used for it, also don't revert away it from being there when we are discussing it, we don't want it to be edit warring, we are just discussing about it, and I think that in this case the native name one is perfectly fine, seeing as there is no section of Names in the personal information section as there is with Elizabeth II, your example. Also to be noted that MicroWiki is not wikipedia and does not implement their rules. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 02:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Still incorrect usage of the infobox. Native name again as i will restate is for names in other languages. I.E any non latin named based person on wikipedia like Zeng Qinghong or Rumen Radev. Yes, indeed Microwiki isn't Wikipedia but when we've imported almost all of our templates from the service it makes little to no sense to not follow what specific things are set up for. --aidan does not speak melayu (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Summi Imperatoris: How about | name = Christina I & II<br>{{small|Christina Hamilton Nowell}} if you wish for it to remain in the infobox? ★ ZabëlleNB ♥︎ (formerly Z Luna Skye) (talk | edits) 03:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I mean that works perfectly fine, I mainly was saying that in the example that he had the piece was still in the infobox, and that I would want it to simply be in the infobox in some way, the way you proposed is perfectly fine. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 05:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

There's a difference between native name and birth name or full name. For eg: in the infobox used on my bio article, my name has been mentioned under native name parameter in two native languages: Hindi and Bengali. That's what the use of native name.

But up here, Christina is using the parameter for her full name which she can under in the parameter of "name" with an "br". Oritsu.me (talk) 04:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Move Request

I think this page should move to Christina I & II due to the UKCL having autonomy on several things including foreign relations as defined by the Second Act of Union 2023 which passed and was granted assent by Christina I & II. This should show then that the UKCL as well is a sovereign nation and should be considered in the nominals of Christina I & II. As well the Grand Republic of Cycoldia has been using the numerals of Christina I & II in documents such as the Independence Day Honours List of 2022. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 ﹠ 𝙸𝙸 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 15:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

@Oritsu.me: Pinging you since you had decided on the last one, so wanted to know your opinion as well on it since now the situation is wildly different. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 ＆ 𝙸𝙸 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 11:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

@Oritsu.me:@Austenasia: Seeing as there's been no reply and it's been over a month also now could the page be moved to Christina I & II for the reasons I had said before on it? That would be really good for it. 𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 ＆ 𝙸𝙸 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 01:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Recogintion

Hello mrs.Cristina I!

This is the president of Slope Monsters a micronation in the eastern part of pittsburgh PA. We would very much appreciate if you could please recognise our micronation in return we will recognize yours.

Thank you and have a good day! --Slope Monsters (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Igor Fadeev--Slope Monsters (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Slope Monsters