MicroWiki:Good articles/Revisits/Archive 1

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopĂŠdia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
OverviewNominationsRevisitsArchivesFeaturedSummariesStatisticsList

January demotions

MicroWiki Influence Survey

Nominator: 𝄞 Strubber ♫ Contributions ♩ 14:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Justification: This article is not rich in content. Sections are fairly short with one just being various dates of when tables were released. This article is mostly made up of long sprawling tables. This article would be good if it included insights into results and more in-depth analysis, but it does not, and there is next to no chance people will be able to go back 10+ years in their memory to add all that information.
Strong agree: Quite frankly this page doesn't come close to GA standard. The criticisms noted by the nominator are very much valid, and this page would do well to have its GA removed. Sertor (Chat) 22:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Support, regrettably, in its current state. The sections including and after Thirteenth Survey have no information about who conducted it/why, how/where it was conducted, methodology etc. Unfortunately, despite being such an historical element of MicroWikian culture, it is simply not GA worthy. If we can get more information from seasoned MicroWikians about these empty surveys, than we can hopefully expand upon them and renominate. Template:ZedSig (talk ❧ contribs) at 20:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto V affair

Nominator: ★ ZabĂ«lleNB ♄ (formerly Z Luna Skye) (talk | edits) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment by nominator: was approved in February 2022 under the agreement that the "issues raised can be corrected quite easily." A year later, none of my concerns in my original oppose vote have been fixed. The article is evidently quite poorly written with informal wording and poor word choice throughout, and the images are poorly formatted. ★ ZabĂ«lleNB ♄ (formerly Z Luna Skye) (talk | edits) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Deva Victrix

Nominator: ★ ZabĂ«lleNB ♄ (formerly Z Luna Skye) (talk | edits) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment by nominator: Aside from 'History', the other parts of the article are fairly poor—the lead is a single sentence; 'Geography and climate' could perhaps be expanded with a climate table; and 'Landmarks' simply consists of a list of locations. The omission of several sections (i.e. 'Economy', 'Culture', 'Architecture' etc, which are definitely plausible additions) leaves a lot to be desired in terms of being a GA. ★ ZabĂ«lleNB ♄ (formerly Z Luna Skye) (talk | edits) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Agree: per nomination Sertor (Chat) 19:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Zed

Nominator: Template:ZedSig (talk ❧ contribs) at 04:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Comment by nominator: Unfortunately this is really not fit for GA status in its current state. It has been in poor shape since about mid-2021, and regrettably I have not the time to update it anytime soon. I cannot really in good conscience let this retain GA status in its current shape; it can always be renominated. Template:ZedSig (talk ❧ contribs) at 04:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

April demotions

Grand Unified Micronational

Nominator: Template:ZedSig (talk ❧ contribs) at 04:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Comment by nominator: Currently suffers heavily from recentism (§ 2022 takes up a huge chunk of the article despite its content not being all that notable) yet is outdated at the same time. There are also glaring issues with the oversized images, inconsistent grammar, strange paragraphing and poor sections which leave a lot to be desired. The article's quality has unfortunately dropped dramatically since late 2020, and is no longer fit for GA status. Template:ZedSig (talk ❧ contribs) at 04:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

APPROVED 𝄞 Strubber ♫ Contributions ♩ 19:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://micronations.wiki/index.php?title=MicroWiki:Good_articles/Revisits/Archive_1&oldid=1770169"