Talk:List of MicroWiki community memes
Latest comment: 5 May 2022 by Z Luna Skye in topic May 2022
Verdis
@Kingdom of Sycamore: Stop removing all criticisms of Verdis just because you feel bad. Literally everyone on MicroWiki@Discod can vouch for all those claims, many of which you even admitted to. You made the same nonconstructive edits on the 2019 article a while back as well. You also removed "[...] for its perceived unrealistic plans and goals,... the rude behaviour of its representatives." How do you justify that? ★ ♥︎ Zed 。 ～ (talk | edits | full) 20:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Z Luna Skye: First off, I'd like to ask where we admitted to any claims of purchasing Instagram followers or 'faking' recognition. Along with this, just because some of your friends agree with the claims you have made, there is no evidence to back it unless you can visually show some. Also, with its unrealistic plans and goals, we understand that every unrecognised state has ambitious goals, let-alone micronations. For rude behaviour of representatives, we suggest you look back at some wording people used to our representatives before they bit back, along with silencing our representatives from even remotely having a response different to the user having a go at them. Don't publish something you can't back while claiming that its 'factual'. That's slander. https://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/court/reporting-defamation.htm - Obviously you can be suspicious, but you can't out of the blue claim that any of this is true without sufficient backing and claiming that it is factual, not opinion. - KOS
- I did not make those claims alone - that is the commonly agreed-upon consensus on MicroWiki@Discord by a large number of users and prominent community members. As far as slander goes, this is a wiki merely echoing many different opinions; the wiki does not itself state weather or not the claims are true. ★ ♥︎ Zed 。 ～ (talk | edits | full) 00:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Very little people made those claims, only active members of the micronational community, which have no inside information. You didn't place 'allegedly' or 'suspected' either. You wrote it as if its factual when you have no evidence to back it, therefore making it Slander. You clearly have some sort of hate for the Verdis project when we're literally just operating the way we believe is right. You don't need to completely #%&# on us for things you can't prove. We also do not classify ourselves as a micronation, making us completely irrelevant from this page overall. The only reason we don't want to be on this is due to the biased wording that can't even be backed, along with the fake survey which we never took part in. - KOS
- It has been an administrator decision to keep the content. If you continue to put the content back administrator action may be taken. --𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 01:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- So you're going to allow non-factual, biased and non-referenced information be permitted on this wiki? - KOS
- It has been an administrator decision to keep the content. If you continue to put the content back administrator action may be taken. --𝙷𝙸𝙼 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝙸 𝚘𝚏 𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚊 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 01:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Very little people made those claims, only active members of the micronational community, which have no inside information. You didn't place 'allegedly' or 'suspected' either. You wrote it as if its factual when you have no evidence to back it, therefore making it Slander. You clearly have some sort of hate for the Verdis project when we're literally just operating the way we believe is right. You don't need to completely #%&# on us for things you can't prove. We also do not classify ourselves as a micronation, making us completely irrelevant from this page overall. The only reason we don't want to be on this is due to the biased wording that can't even be backed, along with the fake survey which we never took part in. - KOS
- I did not make those claims alone - that is the commonly agreed-upon consensus on MicroWiki@Discord by a large number of users and prominent community members. As far as slander goes, this is a wiki merely echoing many different opinions; the wiki does not itself state weather or not the claims are true. ★ ♥︎ Zed 。 ～ (talk | edits | full) 00:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
May 2022
- @Justwatching: It was decided back in February 2021 via administrative decision that it would be kept listed. Your edits removing the entry thus constitutes vandalism, which may result in you being blocked from editing. If you want it to be overturned you will have to ask the administration. ★ Luna ♥︎ (talk | edits) 02:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)