Talk:List of heads of state by diplomatic precedence

Edit war

@DrOwl: & @Ruthenia: I suggest you both not to begin an edit war on the article by removing and undoing edits. As it is an open platform to add informations, I suggest that the information regarding the Emperor-King Oscar I be added but if that is incorrect, it is requested that User:Ruthenia adds the correct information.
Please refer to the wikipedia article of the same List of heads of state by diplomatic precedence.
With regards,
Oritsu.me  • Let's talk here  • Contribs
Wiki Administrator

It's not an edit war: is an user with much time to revert edits and other with few time to make edits on MicroWiki. Despite that, the main problem of the article is to create an order of precedence based in the mentioned article, that use standards established by the United Nations, that, for obvious reasons, cannot or should not be used by micronationalists fully, without major consideration. But nevermind. As said before on the arbitration page, feel free to add me (just once, if possible) and I'll correct when I have time to.

P.S.: just wrote some paragraphs on the article. Hope that doesn't count as "edit war" and add something useful to the discussion - more useful then revert anything without much thought in it.

@Ruthenia: Just a MicroWiki user.

Nature of Precedence

Technically, an Order of Precedence would go by Rank (and date of rank), so you would have all Emperor's Ordered by date of rank, and so on and so forth.