Talk:Federated States of Gapla
Latest comment: 11 February 2023 by Wyatt400 in topic Ok
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the "Federated States of Gapla" article. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| MicroProject Southern California | (Rated B-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
DO NOT delete the referenced thing
Hello Wyatt, I fixed a small issue within the article, which described Idiocia as a "puppet" I found the archived treaty and referenced it, reminder that mw is free to edit, regardless of whether you use it as a government history archive.
- @Westavia: @Ayunipear: Hello Jean. The reason the reference was deleted was because it was out of place. The article no longer mentions Idiocia or any of your puppet states. Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 21:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- What article, the treaty or Gapla? I put that there to clarify that those were not puppet states, not to assure Idiocian existence, so please don't put that they were puppets or I will just edit it with a reference.
- @Westavia: @Ayunipear: I think I like the status quo. I was talking about the Gapla article. No references, no "puppet" terminology. Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 20:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- What article, the treaty or Gapla? I put that there to clarify that those were not puppet states, not to assure Idiocian existence, so please don't put that they were puppets or I will just edit it with a reference.
Ok
Yes, wouldn't want the masses to find out about Juniperia..
- @Westavia: @Ayunipear: You understand that more people knowing the truth about the war is more beneficial to us... why all of this hatred and jealousy? I've advocated for an alliance and friendship every single time this has come up except for when you were tried for what you have done. It seems you're dedicated to hating us, which is kind of sad... Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 17:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Wyatt400:, with due respect, you advocated for the status quo, which was the version that favored GAPLA, reverting edits etc. I am no longer Prime Minister, my opinion does not exactly matter anymore, so even if I do hate Gapla, there is no reason to care for it.
- @Ayunipear: I wonder why you'd hate Gapla. Actually, the status quo is less favorable to us. The original version stated that your two puppet states were your puppet states (I know you disagree about this, we're not arguing about this right now), and had the truth about the war. We agreed to a more concise version that didn't point fingers. If you want, we can negotiate on a new version that would be more neutral if you wish so. Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 16:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Wyatt400: I don't hate Gapla, you guys and Juniperia are extremely different, and to be fair, I don't believe there is a chance for an alliance here, given that its likely that nationalist factions are close to taking control. I would appreciate a neutral version that does not mention any puppet-state terminology. Your game is very clever, Wyatt, you use MW as a primary resource for new citizen applications and thus, want it to be free of any mention of Juniperia in order to eliminate any risk of competition.... --Westavia (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ayunipear: @Westavia: I believe the current version is neutral enough. If you wish to make modifications to the page, you may do so, and if they are neutral enough they will be kept. In addition, our MicroWiki is a very minor source of citizenship applications from our raw website traffic data, and we do not consider Juniperia "competition." I would also request for the jealousy and hatred to end, but it is not a mandate. I truly wish to have peaceful relations with your nation or at least you. Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 06:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Wyatt400: I don't hate Gapla, you guys and Juniperia are extremely different, and to be fair, I don't believe there is a chance for an alliance here, given that its likely that nationalist factions are close to taking control. I would appreciate a neutral version that does not mention any puppet-state terminology. Your game is very clever, Wyatt, you use MW as a primary resource for new citizen applications and thus, want it to be free of any mention of Juniperia in order to eliminate any risk of competition.... --Westavia (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ayunipear: I wonder why you'd hate Gapla. Actually, the status quo is less favorable to us. The original version stated that your two puppet states were your puppet states (I know you disagree about this, we're not arguing about this right now), and had the truth about the war. We agreed to a more concise version that didn't point fingers. If you want, we can negotiate on a new version that would be more neutral if you wish so. Wyatt400 (Wyatt Baek) - Sovereign Prince of Gapla 16:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Wyatt400:, with due respect, you advocated for the status quo, which was the version that favored GAPLA, reverting edits etc. I am no longer Prime Minister, my opinion does not exactly matter anymore, so even if I do hate Gapla, there is no reason to care for it.