Talk:Republic of Slavtria
Latest comment: 16 October 2022 by Catiko in topic Suggestions for page improvement
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
MicroProject Ohio | (Rated C-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This article is graded 17/33 according to the Doan Standard.
|
Untitled
Nicely done page! Sluke91 (talk) 01:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! I saw you added the poor template on the gov't department pages, and I am trying to improve them as much as I can! Catiko (User·Talk) 17:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Suggestions for page improvement
Hello, some minor changes I would make and then some broader changes that could also be implemented.
- Make countries recognized a section under foreign affairs and make foreign affairs its own section
- Add text after countries with mutual recognition or unilateral recognition to indicate how long it has lasted for (see foreign affairs on the KNO page)
- Add flags to each country listed, even if you have to add them using flag icon
- I personally don't see what license plates look like as a thing for the main page of a micronation, could addition, but once they have somewhere else they could go, I would just reserve them for there
- Same with macronations that are/aren't recognized, that could be reserved for a full foreign affair page, and keep relations between micronations on the main page
- Expand on the references, date the documents, add author
- I would recommend using a custom google map to draw the maps used on the page as itll make them more visually appealing I believe, DM me and I can send you a link if you can't find it
- Add references for the more questionable aspects of the page, like the communists being blown up in an explosion, or start to phase those things out as it could make the page look less serious (Removed info about the "explosion")
- Work to remove links to userpages in the article as they aren't encyclopedic pages
Overall, everything in the page is a good start. Structure makes sense and the lead is formatted in a way that can easily be expanded upon. Don't feel like you have to rush to expand everything with filler and every possible detail though, sometimes development just takes time in that regard to have information to add. Ill help with the page as much as you need, just let me know! 𝄞 Strubber ♫ Contributions ♩ 16:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)