Talk:Republic of Slavtria

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Latest comment: 16 October 2022 by Catiko in topic Suggestions for page improvement
Jump to navigation Jump to search
MicroProject Ohio (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of MicroProject Ohio, a collaborate, user led, effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to Micronationalism in Ohio on MicroWiki. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled

Nicely done page! Sluke91 (talk) 01:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! I saw you added the poor template on the gov't department pages, and I am trying to improve them as much as I can! Catiko (User·Talk) 17:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suggestions for page improvement

Hello, some minor changes I would make and then some broader changes that could also be implemented.

  • Make countries recognized a section under foreign affairs and make foreign affairs its own section Green tickY
  • Add text after countries with mutual recognition or unilateral recognition to indicate how long it has lasted for (see foreign affairs on the KNO page) Green tickY
  • Add flags to each country listed, even if you have to add them using flag icon Green tickY
  • I personally don't see what license plates look like as a thing for the main page of a micronation, could addition, but once they have somewhere else they could go, I would just reserve them for there Green tickY
  • Same with macronations that are/aren't recognized, that could be reserved for a full foreign affair page, and keep relations between micronations on the main page Green tickY
  • Expand on the references, date the documents, add author ☒N
  • I would recommend using a custom google map to draw the maps used on the page as itll make them more visually appealing I believe, DM me and I can send you a link if you can't find it Green tickY
  • Add references for the more questionable aspects of the page, like the communists being blown up in an explosion, or start to phase those things out as it could make the page look less serious Green tickY (Removed info about the "explosion")
  • Work to remove links to userpages in the article as they aren't encyclopedic pages Green tickY

Overall, everything in the page is a good start. Structure makes sense and the lead is formatted in a way that can easily be expanded upon. Don't feel like you have to rush to expand everything with filler and every possible detail though, sometimes development just takes time in that regard to have information to add. Ill help with the page as much as you need, just let me know! 𝄞 StrubberContributions ♩ 16:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gonna add check marks and X's next to these so I can know which ones I still need to do. Catiko (User · Talk) 20:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]