Talk:Kingdom of Ireland

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Latest comment: 4 December 2018 by People's Republic of Phokland in topic Deletion of Article
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deletion of Article

Dear Austenasia, the following are the reasons are why I marked this article for deletion:

1. Dubious: The article contains multiple factual errors and show no sources or citations for many of the claims made here not the least of which is Mr. Perkins' claim as the king of Ireland. I have spoken with him and he admits that his only claim to the throne is him emailing the incumbent President of the Republic of Ireland.

2. Prior Behavior: User Lanzantonia has been no stranger to reports as several of his past pages have been reported for their lack of quality and the user himself has been reported for threatening users and for basic rude behavior. This is besides the point but what I am coming at is the fact that by creating this new article, he is claiming monarchal status in a MACRONATION. This may be brushed off by users as a fantasy roleplaying micronation but as emails between myself and him have showed (will be provided in form of screenshots upon request), he is genuinely claiming this. This only goes to solidify my belief that this user and the pages he has created are toxic to the wiki and while I don't believe that Lanzantonia deserves to be banned, I do think that the page needs to be taken down. I tried to edit the page to make it more realistic in an order to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he then proceeded to change the articles back to what he wanted.

In conclusion, this is why I believe that this article should be removed from MicroWiki.

Thanks, --People's Republic of Phokland (talk) 02:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think the article necessarily warrants deletion. It makes it quite clear that this is a pretentious (in the proper sense of the word) claim; nobody reading this is going to think that he actually controls Ireland. I have removed the list of monarchs though, as it was one massive line of red links and was historically inaccurate in several respects anyway. Austenasia (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

fair enough, I'll just move on, thanks talk.

thanks- --People's Republic of Phokland (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]