Talk:Intermicronational Traditionalist League

I would dispute the neutrality of this article's tone, specifically this section: "The APA is ignorant to BLM and Antifa's on mass attacks and damaging of public property, private property and even people around them. The APA "condemns" any nation that dares classify these organizations as a terrorist group, yet they still recognize every macronation that legally condemns them as terrorist organizations. Terrorism is defined as such - (the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.) Both BLM and Antifa fall under this direct description. The APA also holds the January 6th Capital Riot to be a superbly negative thing in comparison to BLM and Antifa whilst the F.B.I estimates that during 2020 alone the damage from riots and looting across the U.S. following the death of George Floyd is estimated to be the costliest in insurance history – between $1 billion and $2 billion. Along with 700+ officers injured and 20+ civilians dead at BLM's hands. Antifa has caused over 400 Million in damages to private businesses alone and injured hundreds according to the F.B.I as well. Not only does the APA sympathize with and support these so obvious dangerous organizations but as well at one time called its self an Antifa organization." It appears to be biased toward the organization's views. The facts are fine, but it states opinions in some cases instead of facts. "The APA is ignorant..." "Not only does the APA sympathize with and support these so obviously dangerous organizations..." ------ King Anonymous of Suttornland (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)