Talk:Micronational reactions to the Russian invasion of Ukraine
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the "Micronational reactions to the Russian invasion of Ukraine" article. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
 | This page is within the scope of MicroProject Current Events, a MicroWiki project dedicated to increasing the coverage of current events in both macro and micronational spheres on MicroWiki. |
Supports
Notice how all of the supporting micronations are socialist of some sort? -- President Devin Purcell 
Penn Federal Republic 19:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Most socialist micronations view Russia as the successor to the USSR JDFRG (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Discussion on regional/national English variation to be used.
Hello! I propose that American English should be used, however, it is up for discussion. Please make your points so a broad consensus can be reached. Your's Truly, MicroProject Current Events Staff. -- President Devin Purcell Penn Federal Republic 12:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- According to the Manual of style, "Don't add American English syntax when a page already uses British English. If an existing page mixes British and American language, standardise it to American English if the article is about a micronation based in the USA and British English if not." --
Liahonia.gov (talk)
- @Liahonia.gov: See that's the thing, it has both British and American micronations, referring to an event in Ukraine. -- President Devin Purcell Penn Federal Republic 12:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Devinpurcell: I honestly thin we should just leave it be, not change it, unless admin says otherwise... -- Liahonia.gov (talk)
- Which variant is it currently written in? ★ Luna ♥︎ (talk | edits) 05:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Z Luna Skye: Both American and British Syntaxes. -- Liahonia.gov (talk)
- I think it would probably be best to use what was used first. According to the edit revisions, the article was created by the user Jak123, however it cannot be determined which variant was used as it contained little text. Going by that logic I mentioned first, would it be improper to let Jak123 decide which variant be used? ★ Luna ♥︎ (talk | edits) 15:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Z Luna Skye: I was the second person to make edits to the page, when it was extremely barebones, and as staff of MicroWiki:MicroProject Current Events I vote for American English, because I am American and America is #1. -- President Devin Purcell Penn Federal Republic 16:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Z Luna Skye: I was the second person to make edits to the page, when it was extremely barebones, and as staff of MicroWiki:MicroProject Current Events I vote for American English, because I am American and America is #1. -- President Devin Purcell
- I think it would probably be best to use what was used first. According to the edit revisions, the article was created by the user Jak123, however it cannot be determined which variant was used as it contained little text. Going by that logic I mentioned first, would it be improper to let Jak123 decide which variant be used? ★ Luna ♥︎ (talk | edits) 15:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Z Luna Skye: Both American and British Syntaxes. --
- Which variant is it currently written in? ★ Luna ♥︎ (talk | edits) 05:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Devinpurcell: I honestly thin we should just leave it be, not change it, unless admin says otherwise... --
- @Liahonia.gov: See that's the thing, it has both British and American micronations, referring to an event in Ukraine. -- President Devin Purcell
Discussion on proposed change
Despite being MicroProject Current Events staff, I feel this needs a community consensus.
- Option A: Keep as same
- Option B: Move all descriptions of the country's supports to notes under references. Looks cleaner on the list itself.
I think option B, but let me know. -- President Devin Purcell Penn Federal Republic 12:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I agree with option B --JDFRG (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Finished -- President Devin Purcell Penn Federal Republic 11:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)