Talk:Empire of Etukan

From MicroWiki, the free micronational encyclopædia
Latest comment: 12 July 2020 by Empress Steinbeck in topic Reliability of this Article
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A moment of your time

Hello,

I am sorry for bugging you but I was curious if you would like to join an organisation I represent known as the League of Professional Nations. We are a respected group made up of various professional nations and relatively well known states from throughout the community. Our goal is to create a community of micronationalists dedicated to the hobby and to evolve our organisation as time goes on. I reccommend you read our wiki page for more information.

Please let me know, Best regards, --A chap from Phokland (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bias and disputed

Hello, multiple terms on here are very bias, such as "vast" and the statement of "the population would rocket upwards by hundreds". Please fix the unencyclopedic language. As well the statements in the "Empire of Etukan and Republic of Eora" and "Modern Period (July 2019-Present)" sections are very disputed on the facts, and are presented that most of the things said in it are factually inaccurate, and a present of one sided history and an attempt to manipulate the truth. --HIM Christina I of Cycoldia (talk) 01:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The only person manipulating the truth is you. It is your specialty and everybody in every corner of the community knows it.

Deletion

The Etukara Government has determined that due to both recent and past actions of MicroWiki's moderators and members, all articles regarding Etukan or articles that have been made by Etukara citizens are to be deleted. --Empress Steinbeck (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately that's not your decision to make. We have a deletion policy, and "trolls vandalised an unrelated website" doesn't fall under the criteria. Please stop treating this like some sort of diplomatic dispute. By the way, MicroWiki doesn't have "members", only users, just like any other wiki. Austenasia (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It actually is. This article is my intellectual property and if it is not removed immediately then you can expect trouble. --Empress Steinbeck (talk) 22:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not an administrator and I am sure that I will be told off by Jon or someone else if I am wrong about this, but I am pretty sure MicoWiki follows the same standard that Wikipedia uses in that any originally written text or original images that have been uploaded for specific use on this site fall under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Which tldr, means to edit this you must attribute the original author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). If you would like to read more please take a look here. Additionally, "... it is not removed immediately then you can expect trouble" seems mildly threatening and I would advise taking a more amicable tone if you would like for something to get done in a timely and proper manner. Thank you. --Billiam Bilson 22:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL --ThatMLGDorito (talk) 00:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yep, Wilson's correct. Stop pretending to be "MicroWiki's main competitor" when you clearly don't know the first thing about running or using a wiki. Austenasia (talk) 08:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have zero knowledge of what you are talking about and if I did I frankly would not care. My governments orders are to get rid of our pages on here as we have been wanting to do so for months. I seriously do not understand why you are bent on keeping these articles despite the admin's having clearly plastered "The neutrality of this article or section is disputed. The tone and content of the article may require rewriting to remove bias. Please see the discussion on the talk page. The factual accuracy of this article is in dispute. You can assist by discussing on the discussion page in order to clear up any inaccuracies. This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopaedic tone used on MicroWiki. This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. The discussion page may contain suggestions."
These allegations are fair and I agree this page is run down, and seeing as it's author wants it taken down I seriously do not understand what your problem is with it's removal. You practically have a giant sticker on it reading "THIS DOES NOT BELONG ON MICROWIKI". --Empress Steinbeck (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article meets criteria for deletion as it has an abundance of redlinks --Empress Steinbeck (talk) 10:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://youtu.be/laaUFxhzqIs Garvey64 (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No links on the article are red (not working). The article will not be deleted. You do not get to decide if it does. cameron (talk) 04:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reliability of this Article

This article is full to the brim with false information that is poorly written, unsourced and biased in parts to both Etukan and to Jonathan I’s childish narrative. If microwiki’s administration wants to hurt their name more, I suggest you continue to keep up this article that you have called biased and low quality and whose authors you have restricted from your site, all for the sake of spite and immaturity. On the other hand, you can take down the article and show that deep down, the Emperor of Austenasia isn’t a complete man child. Bigman844847 (talk) 02:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everything on here was either 1) written by representatives of Etukan themselves or 2) agreed upon by those who have encountered Etukan as accurately reflecting the facts. This is a factual encyclopaedia, so the article will stay up in its present form unless this micronation changes its ways and so justifies a rewriting of the content. Austenasia (talk) 08:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As the main author of this article, I can safely deny that I am a representative of Etukan in anyway shape or form. I can also safely say that everything I have written on this article is either a lie or exageration. The remainder of the article is mainly written by you, and your only "encounter" with Etukan has been with me, and last I checked I am not even a citizen of the country.--Empress Steinbeck (talk) 22:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]