Talk:David I of Hawthorne

B Class Article "Congratulations on achieving a class B article keep up the good work and next time try for A class" - David Hawthorne This page has achieved the grade of B which is the second best ranking a MicroWiki page can get on the Iudette Scale.

Anything needed?

Im thinking about what it need anyone have any ideas? --Dusty (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

COPYEDIT

Someone Please do a copyedit i would appreciate it.--Dusty (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Ya wee melon

Yae stole me signature, ya wee melon Sertor (Chat) 20:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
HAHAHAHHA -- Isaiah (Chat) 21:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Recent Edits

recent edits have added something to my page about simulationist times I would like to try to refine my image in the community as i have stopped server raiding and "nuking" i regret those times and would like to leave them in the past. i'm not trying to hide the fact i used to be a server raider but it doesn't really feel right to keep them on the page as that was old times and i don't want that to be what people remember me for. it also had nothing to do with Micronationalism as i don't consider simulationism part of micronationalism.Please vote on this. -- Isaiah (Chat) 01:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit Warring

There appears to be quite a bit a edit warring going on. In the past 24 hours, an editor has performed 3 reverts (in most wikis this is considered to be bad practice). The content contributed by several users (User:HM King David II, User:Jaydenfromcanada, User:Sertor Valentinus and User:BelarusianIggy) is see-sawing back and forth through reverts and blanking by User:David Hawthorne.

If a consensus cannot be reached, the page may have to be temporarily locked to prevent unproductive warring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sertor Valentinus (talk • contribs)

This is an encyclopedia, and you cannot gloss over recorded history. Therefore, I believe the comments about your past need to stay. TBainbridge (talk)

Farish Scale score

D class article Congratulations! This page has achieved a score of 5-6 on the Farish Scale, granting it the grade of D.

Factual accuracy of "controversy" section

@David Hawthorne: The paragraphs I posted were referenced. You can't just make it inaccurate by saying it's inaccurate, you have to discredit the sources. The sources were reliable, and so until you can prove that they are in fact "wrong", the paragraphs shall be considered factually correct. addison (talk) 06:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

They were wrong I was there, the sources were biased and not third party you also didn't post sources for a lot of things, I'm also a 1st person source as I was actually there.@AgentBro:-- Isaiah (Chat) 07:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@David Hawthorne: That is contradictory to what you just said, that the sources were biased. Just "being there" doesn't make your sources any more reliable. And yes, I posted references for every sentence and claim. addison (talk) 12:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

The sources were literally wrong there was no motion to congress to declare war they were literally less then a paragraph and made by the opponent not a third party. You used a opinion article on Zabëlle to show I denounced my actions and called them simulationist which makes literally no sense. Being part of the conflict absolutely does make them biased especially when it was made by the leader of Elba.