Talk:Daniel Maloney
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the "Daniel Maloney" article. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding controversial content and consider tagging or removing hard-to-verify unsourced information. |
12 January 2022
This page needs to be deleted as it has been used for de-platforming and must be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boeingfan (talk • contribs)
Please delete this damn page
it is too one-sided and has been used for bullying Boeingfan (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Undo this as it makes sense to keep it up in modded from Boeingfan (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Undo this as it makes sense to keep it up in modded Boeingfan (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion
This page is being used for bullying, Dan has been doxxed and pizza bombed by those who created this page. I would like to encourage its deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImperatorofOrini (talk • contribs)
Attempted ban evasion
This page is being edited and attempted to be deleted by someone who is obviously Maloney doing ban evasion (his old Discord name was Cessnafan). If this person really doxxed a minor, I don't see why anyone should wring their hands over the fact he's being "pizza bombed" or whatever that means. Sounds like all parties involved are acting childishly, but as someone Daniel's age, I'd encourage him to grow up and stop trying to avoid accountability for being a weirdo. If MicroWiki admins want to call other things safeguarding risks but not this, I don't know what the word is supposed to mean anymore. PremierOfNordale (talk) 03:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is the issue with micronationalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImperatorofOrini (talk • contribs)
Blanked and locked?
Yes, I understand why this page was locked due to the ongoing edit war, but all the evidence of him doxxing minors was removed as well? I don't understand why microwiki admins want to cover up evidence of someone willfully doxxing a minor, everything was referenced accordingly. Blanking the page leads to nothing of value, it might as well be deleted at this point if you're going to cover things like this up. This is equivalent to removing the pedophilia section from Jeffrey Epstein's wikipedia page because it could be considered "biased". Nothing on this page was biased or incorrect, all information was clearly factual and referenced. UOMS 5:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
It solves a problem
It's not biased. It solves the problem of the page being used as evidence by Dan's bullies, the Micronational Assembly. The page was nominated for deletion by yours truly to ensure that it couldn't be used for bullying, but it seems the problem is solved. ImperatorofOrini (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)