User talk:Überstadt

From MicroWiki, the micronational encyclopædia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mikejones (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 19 May 2017. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to: navigation, search

Concerns For List of Micronations by Government

Überstadt, I see that you say you came to a conclusion for the list with other wiki users, but I was never contactedd about the matter, although I am the creator of the list. I simply do not have the time to change all of those nations, back to the way that they were originally on the list. That is why we should leave it be and let nations add to it the way they want their nations to be seen on that list. If I keep having to fix the list, then that is what is making the article useless. There is a simple solution to that. We can all come to an agreement on how the list should look, and change to that way. Perhaps we should just start the entire list back over. Thanks,

      President Trenton Daniel of the Republic of Danielland (talk) 02:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Diplomatic relations

would you like to engage in diplomatic relations I know last time you disagreed but I have improved my article and become a member of the gum and I removed the island claim so am I Acceptable King Wallace of Archland


look at User talk:Cip#Re:Answer. Dániel-Jürgen (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I would just like to clear up why you reversed my edits on the History of Freya article. I have been in communication with Trace Fleeman, the creator of the article and current leader of Freya, and we have come to an agreement to merge the articles for a more factual and unbiased presentation of Californian micronational histor


You have no right to do that!


Reply about the MAP

Not exactly, the areas in orange are just "influence areas" that the USI might have, USI only claims 1 or 3 areas in those shaded orange, you can see that in Republic of USI's article.
--AGMVieira (talk) 12:11, 22 August 2014 (BST)

Re: Deletion Policy

Dear Sir, I appreciate that you have took the time to fix up my page. Is there some tips you could give me on how to make a great page like your?

Sincerely, Jackson Cole President of K.U.R

DRB 00

Seems that Belia, after that you blocked for indefinite times two of his accounts, created a new one, this time is DRB 00. I hope You can do something more, seems he never will stop to create other accounts. Fabriziodg91 (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

We explained already by email that we want to continue with our project. We can't understand how if we change something in your page of Hashima, we broke your freedom of speech, but then if you change the page of Belia and we edit we are in vandalism.

Could we delete stuff in our Talk section that we want to erase

I was wondering if we could delete stuff we don't want to or do not want people to see like stuff we messed up on Because I got this one user keep telling me I can not delete stuff in my talk section

Can You Help Resolve This?

Me and the user Bilalirfan2004 are having a back and forth edit-reedit cycle over Kermadecia's wiki article, of which the two version can be viewed here: [1]. Please help resolve this idiotic debate between me and this child, before it drives me to the brink of insanity! Giitu! DNSgov (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Need Help

Hello, I'm thinking about making a government in exile (rather, Soviet Union) instead of a micronation but you could call it a micronation I suppose. I need some help with the right direction and such. Luke27262 (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Need Help, again impersonater

Hi Adam,

Someone is still impersonating Hasan and deleting our pages. --Chi-rho.svg HIM Aleksandr IV TALK 13:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Impersonator again

Hey, can you do something about User:OIMGov? He seems to have registered a new account. --F1 green flag.png OIMGov (talk) 22:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Rejoin the Forums

My request to seek consul with regards to rejoining the forums a few weeks ago to Emperor Jonathan of Austenasia seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Noticing your recent comments with regards to user Memiel's concerns with my readmission, I would like to ask you where this "staff consultation" currently stands. Thank you for your time. DNSgov (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)



I understand the reason for the warning, and for that reason among others, I think I'm done with editing anyway for the time being; I'd rather not push it. If I ever do edit again, then I will refrain from making these mistakes. Thank you.

-Nedland (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

On second thought, maybe not, but I will only stick to what I absolutely know is per wiki policy (which is basically adding cleanup templates and categories, and what I've done so far regarding inactive and defunct templates). Nedland (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)