From MicroWiki, the micronational encyclopædia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tsar Stefan I (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 27 December 2020. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The "evidence" of corruption in the GUM is obviously a joke. As if the Chair would just admit to being corrupt in the public lobby? You might want to amend this article to reflect that. ADAMVS PRIMVS IMPERATOR 19:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

You must be joking. That "evidence for corruption" clearly looks fabricated/fabricable. I could have done that in 5 minutes with MS Paint. So please stop stirring controversy and trying to damage the Chair's reputation. Cristi (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@Christi Why don't you check yourself? The chat is still there in GUM's discord. Just search for the timestamps and compare. Microwikileaks (talk) 10:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Doesn't change the fact that the conversation was clearly not meant to be taken seriously. ADAMVS PRIMVS IMPERATOR 14:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Specify time period

Hello, can you please specify the "time period" of the article? Which chair is meant to be the current chair that is conspired against? One of the screenshots was taken ten months ago under a different chairmanship. Is this purposefully vague? --Luxor (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This was March 2020, so Thomas was Chair at the time. Microwikileaks (talk) 15:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

So why are you trying to impeach the current Chair with evidence from 8 months ago? bearing in mind the fact that the 'evidence' you provided is clearly a joke. Empire of Aenopia flag.png Logan (Aenopia)  Terry Tibbs talk to me  Look at what I've done. Empire of Aenopia flag.png 16:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

We are not trying to impeach the current Chair or anyone in fact. We are an informational outlet and publish materials that are sent to us by micronationalists. Regarding the corruption dialogue - sure, it might be a joke. But it's always easy to defend anything by saying "oh, it's just a joke".

Microwikileaks (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Whoever you are - this is provocative. URA will not tolerate blackmailing and if you publish any confidential information that belongs to us - sanctions will follow by law. Unauthorized access to files is against the law in many micronations. URA (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)