User talk:Austenasia

From MicroWiki, the micronational encyclopædia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Austenasia (talk | contribs) at 16:41, 12 November 2015. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to: navigation, search


Please leave any messages for me below. Note that Austenasia does not consider non-solicited requests for diplomacy from micronations. Formal communication of any other nature should be addressed to - this page is for discussing matters related solely to the administration and upkeep of MicroWiki. Austenasia (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Good Article Preview

I'm considering submit the page Kingdom of Ruthenia to the analysis of the administrators to win the status of 'Good Article'. On the page that talks about the selection process, I read that before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback. And I would really appreciate a feedback. So, if you can, I want to submit my article to your analysis. I'm waiting for an answer.

Already grateful,
Oscar of Ruthenia (talk)

Thank you.

Although my article is not chosen, the good side of feedback is that my article becomes better. I confess that I have some difficulty with the English language, so I do not think there are unlikely to exist errors of this order... If you can advise me at least help me somewhere where I'm stupid, I'd be extremely happy. In fact, I'm already very happy with the response, however brief. I know your time is short and, really, I thank you.
Already grateful,
Oscar of Ruthenia (talk)

Some doubts.

First of all, forgive me for the delay in responding. I've been a bit busy and I wanted to check their interventions carefully. And of course, could not have been better. Only very brief corrections, everything is perfect. But I'm just not sure of the one aspect.

You mention that evidence is needed about the domain that my family exercised in the region before the formation of the kingdom. This is at least subjective. My family settled in the area for about two hundred years. The areas that I say are part of the kingdom (Land of St. Stephen and Land of St. Peter and St. Paul), are owned farms of my family, except for one which was recently acquired (10 years ago). Brazil is a very rustic country in some respects and different of Europe in the category family records. Stories are told orally, that's the point. How to prove it? Can you give me some idea? I do not think putting here the birth certificate of my great grandfather is an idea. There is a pedigree record of a part of my father's family, I could use as bibliographic reference, but it is a short-run book, only in Brazil. I do not know if would serve as evidence.

As for the other aspects, I might take a little more time to accomplish, but I will do it as soon as possible. I need to correct that we are a constitutional monarchy and the Ruthenian photos themselves are easy. Red links will be made or redirected to the right place, are only 3. The truth is that I now have a far better article and I thank you so much!

Already grateful,
Oscar of Ruthenia (talk)

Current Headlines

Hi Jonathan,

I'd like to request consideration of the Coprieta Standard to be a pre-approved publication for the Current Headlines section for when there are suitably in-depth articles to contribute to same.


Liam Sinclair (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2015 (BST)


I recently discovered that after uploding one of our countries former flags, some nations who had uploded a file under the same names flags had been replaced with mine. I am deeply sorry. The country i found was san dover but there may be more, thanks


Approved Publications

Greetings, I'd like to request that if Abeldane Times may be possibly be added to the approved publications on the news feed? Here is the site:

I'm hoping for a reply soon.

I'll raise the matter with the other admins. Austenasia (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2015 (BST)
Alright, thank you. We also replaced the Abeldane Times' site with a new one. Here: .AbeldenGov

General Guudeen Mumbasa does not approve of this!

Dear Emperor Jonathan I,

The president has heard you deleted his Microwiki page. He does not approve of this. As chief Bananian ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain And Northern Ireland, it is my duty to let you know that General Mumbasa will personally come to Wryth on the back of a chimpanzee, and slaughter every insect within a 4 meter radius of your home.

Best Wishes, Kaagla Kumbassa

Bananian Creol Translation:

Der émpéror jánaśin I,

Da pwezident haz herd yu deeleted hiz mykrowike paj. He dus not aproov ov śis. Az ćef bannanian ambasador tu da yunited kingdum ov grét britan ánd norśern ierland, it iz mi dute tu lét yu now dat jenral mumbasa wil persunale cum tu riś on da bak ov a ćimpanze, and sláter evre insect wiśin a 4 metér radeus ov yur hom.

Bést wećéz, Kaagla Kumbassa

དཧནབ གཇཀཀ གལལགས ཀལཅ

Dear Emperor Jonathan I,

I must inform you General Guudeen Mumbasa officially forgives your nations actions. He also states that if you were to visit the Banana Republic, you will be welcomed with more then a few hugs, smiles and severely malnourished children. I also want to personally apologize for spelling your nations glorious capital, Wrythe, incorrectly. The Banana Republic hopes to create diplomatic relations with Austenasia, right after General Mumbasa returns from The Hague, where he is currently on trial for crimes against humanity.

Best Wishes,

Kaagla Kumbassa

Chief Bananian Ambassador to the

United Kingdom of Great Britian And Northern Ireland

0000 Zero Street, London, UK.

Dear Emperor Jonathan I,


Best Wishes,

Kaagla Kumbasa

Article improvement


I recently nominated the article "Usian Republic" for consideration as a Good Article. I believe you abstained because there are "several minor things which need fixing." I'll gladly fix these minor things, but would you please be so kind as to give me pointers on which things you were referring to specifically?

Many thanks in advance,
-- HoE Seal.PNG Gabriel N. Pelger (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2015 (BST)

Thank you for responding so promptly. I have fixed most of the issues. Template:Coord worked all right when I first used it (doesn't anymore), but I'm not really very wiki savvy, so I just removed it altogether. Still working on pictures of leaders and locations, there are a few difficulties though, so I don't know if I'll be able to fix that anytime soon.
-- HoE Seal.PNG Gabriel N. Pelger (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2015 (BST)
I have managed to add several photographs of places in the Usian Republic, if you'd most kindly be willing to consider the article again when you have time. -- HoE Seal.PNG Gabriel N. Pelger (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2015 (BST)


Your majesty,

May you delete these page? I didn't use these pages anymore:

  • Shenglinese Yuan - Author request
  • File:Shengli claims.png - Unused duplicate
  • Paowan Kingdom and Paowan - The King asks me to delete this page
  • - Privacy concerns
  • File:William Timothy Potrait.png and File:William Timothy C360.jpg - Uploader request, unused

Thank you,

--His Imperial Majesty, Holder of the Throne of Hōō, Holder of the Throne of Pegasus Kiseki Toyosaki (usertalk) 16:04, 28 July 2015 (BST)

Mistake on deleting pages


thanks for deleting these pages. However, you did a mistake. You didn't need to delete William Timothy (main page), you just only need to delete these unused redirect.

So may you restore my page William Timothy and my picture (Que Wu-huang.png and Kiseki Toyosaki.png)?

Thank you --His Imperial Majesty, Holder of the Throne of Hōō, Holder of the Throne of Pegasus Kiseki Toyosaki (usertalk) 09:08, 30 July 2015 (BST)

Naming convention

Hello Jonathan,

You just made this comment to a edit "He can call you whatever he wants, and it's the name you publicly use. Can we stop the edit reverting now?" Are you sure this is the policy you wan't to pursue because in this case nobody should expect their micronational pseudonyms to be used.

Deniz | Talk 08:04, 9 August 2015 (BST)

It's not a pseudonym, though, it's a regnal name. You've never tried to keep "Deniz Tezcan" private - it's your Skype name, your Facebook name, and simply what everyone knows you as. "Deniz Tezcan" is all over the Lostisland article, and even your wiki signature is signed "Deniz"! If this was a case of someone like Linden, d'Égtavie, or Kuri being called by their birth name when they clearly don't want it used, then my response would be different, but your real name is already all over the wiki and you've never had a problem with it being used before now. Austenasia (talk) 08:25, 9 August 2015 (BST)
Jon, stop being a hypocrite. Linden, Bradley, Richard, Anderson and many other micronationalists who use pseudonyms appear with their real names on facebook, Skype and other venues - using a pseudonym doesn't necessarily imply paranoically hiding your real name from everyone, as it was up to this day an agreement was in effect that should someone opt for using a name on the wiki different from the one in passport, said choice would be respected. This was discussed already numerous times, and last year you even removed a link to Sandus's article because it referenced Bradley's legal name. This case is no different, and you continuous desire to not respect the chosen name of a micronationalist is clearly in violation of the established wiki policy and nothing but part of your personal grudge against Pavlov. --Yaroslav (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2015 (BST)
Yaroslav, Deniz has has name all over the wiki. It's in his signature. It's on Lostisland and related articles. This isn't a matter of "real-life name"/"wiki name". I'll "respect the chosen name of a micronationalist" when you remove his name from Lostisland's article and he removes it from his signature. Now that's hypocrisy. Austenasia (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2015 (BST)
Hello, the point we are trying to get across is simple - if you wish to use two names simultaneously, you are free to do so, as long as you let anyone use them on their articles. It is not an issue with pseudonyms or real names, it is simply an issue with using multiple names and specifying who can use one or the other. If Deniz wishes to use a pseudonym, we could replace every mention of Deniz Tezcan on the Wiki with Alexander IV., which was done a few times before. --Luxor (talk) 15:14, 9 August 2015 (BST)
Jesus Christ, is it that hard to understand? The real name is used in regards to Lostisland, the pseudonym - to Pavlov. If he was banned as the Pavlovian Emperor, he has every right to expect to be referenced as the article about Pavlov suggests. --Yaroslav (talk) 16:41, 9 August 2015 (BST)
I don't understand what the problem is at the moment Jonathan, you see to want to argue for the sake of arguing... Yaroslav has talked with Ned and he agreed on keeping the name on the list to Alexander IV, so I guess problem is solved...
If Ned's okay with it being that, fine. But that's the whole point. It's up to Ned. Either every instance of "Deniz Tezcan" on the wiki is replaced with "Alexander IV", or anyone can use either one. You can't call him Deniz Tezcan on your articles and insist someone calls him Alexander IV on theirs. That's not arguing for the sake of arguing, that's applying a fair and consistent policy. Austenasia (talk) 17:14, 9 August 2015 (BST)
For starters you should understand that in Lostisland there is no possibility of being known as Alexander IV, as I'm not the Monarch of Lostisland neither Lostisland is a Monarchy. A suitable compromise would be to change it to Alexander Karapavlovic. Do you have a tool to change it all at once? Alexander IV | Talk 17:27, 9 August 2015 (BST)


Respectfully, we address to the Administrator to request the exclusion of the page since this is a plagiary page of the original one, Departments of the Ruthenian Government. Uncontroversial is plagiarism, since even the coat of arms of the departments of Ruthenian Government is being misused. I demand measures against plagiarism and against the user who did it. I await answer to my request.

Oscar of Ruthenia. Ruthenia (talk)

Deleting all my pages

Besides Nedlands page, delete them all, thanks. Grant can't change anything. It doesn't matter anymore.

Nvm, I want my main page deleted too. Delete everything.


Before Jon says anything, I would just like to say that it is generally not our policy to delete pages without a reason. Why should they be deleted? Überstadt (talk) 07:59, 14 August 2015 (BST)
What Adam said. Austenasia (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2015 (BST)

Good article

Dear Austenasia,
I did a nomination for an article, to receive the Good article status, 3 days ago.
Since still it hasn't received an answer, and since the rules say that the decision should arrive in 7 days after the nomination, i invite you to give a look to my nomination.
Thanks in advance!
--Fabriziodg91 (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2015 (BST)

Help me, vandalizing in corse

Austenasia, an user (Democratic Republic Belia), is doing vandalizing on the MicroWiki's page of the United Micronations 2014 (, censuring my expulsion and ban against him (for a reason that is very clear, and he deleted also the reason) and also expulsion of another member. Oh, Belia created also this article ( that is not mattering of nothing, i said him that he can't, firstly because he's not more a member of the United Micronations, and second because only the Chairman of the UM can decide about that matter. But he continued a editing war. Please stop him, and if possible, protect the page of the United Micronations at the least, because he will never stop to vandalize. This is a serious case of an user that vandalize the website and don't allow to others to say the truth and don't allow the freedom of speech, because deleted important pieces of the article itself, concerning important and real things. Please, keep the page ( to my edit of 13:35, 12 November 2015‎, when all the truth is visible. I can't tollerate more from the vandalizing and tyrannic behavior of Belia, the truth has to remain visible to everyone, and my freedom of speech is inviolable, i pretend that my edit remains, also because as incumbent chairman that is very important and is reporting the reason of the expelling of Belia (that deleted the reason, and re-admitted unilaterally to the organization, this is another vandalizing behavior). I invite You also to take a look to its Twitter account, where he talks about his navy that is ready to go to Syria, completely fantasious and vandalizing if reported here too. Please, i trust in Your honesty and i hope you will bring back legality and freedom of speech to this website, and punish the continue vandalizing behavior of Belia (i've warned him a lot of times, but he never listened to me, just accusing me to be vandal and a dictator).

I've locked the page for 32 hours. I suggest you use that time to sort out Belia's position within the UM. Austenasia (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I already tried a lot of times to talk in civil way for solve the problem, but Belia is only interested to accuse me of being a dictator, only because i wanted that he respected a treaty signed and approved by himself too. I invite you, if you can, to improve the security of the page, because after the 32 hours you can be sure that Belia will start again his vandalism and his edit warring. Also, what is your position about my right of speech? Belia, continuing with his vandalism and his edit warring, violated my right of speech, and also the right of speech to the whole United Micronations, because me, the incumbent Chairman, i wasn't able to update the page and keep the truth inside it. Belia only wanted, as how you can read on the history, to remove his expulsion/ban, remove the reasons, and make me appear like a dictator. This is unacceptable, the behavior of Belia has been very bad, continued vandalism and continued violation of the right of speech, these two things deserve a strong position from You.

If You will not move, after the 32 hours Belia will continue with his vandalism and violation of the right of speech. The page of the United Micronations (and who knows, maybe more articles) will be vandalized and censured by the willing of Belia.

Hello, the Democratic Republic of Belia will not agree this decision autoritaly of Hashima, Belia thinks the position autoritary of Hashima is against the target of United Micronations, [1] here all members showed their position, Hashima doesn't respect any opinion, just for this Belia proposed the vote to expell Hashima from United Micronations, Hashima called us tirany, we propose to vote to expell Hashima, Hashima expells Belia alone without respect the opinion of members.

The Democratic Republic of Belia has been expelled because, declaring war against ISIS, has violated the treaty that Belia itself approved and signed as necessary for enter inside the United Micronations, because its bellicose past (had a lot of wars, publishing pictures of fake armies claiming as own). You haven't respected the treaty, and then have you been expelled, after a lot of warnings (i warned you a lot of times to the consequences). On the treaty itself is wrote that a declaration of war will be punished with an expulsion.

Belia has been expelled only because this, and is clear and wrote the reason. The Principality of Hashima doesn't violated the target of the United Micronations. The targets of the United Micronations are "Peace and development between world micronations". Hashima insisted for the respect of the treaty, that has been unilaterally violated by Belia. Hashima respected the targets of peace and development, while Belia pressed for war and destruction. You never wanted to listen, and now you declared war to ISIS, with your fake army (like the pics of armies fake and admitted by you too). The only one that don't want to listen, that keeps an authoritarian position (never wanted to listen to my advices and never wanted to respect the treaty signed by yourself too) is you. Hashima respect every opinion, sorry if we are against authoritarian simulationist micronations that want only to break official documents signed by themselves and to declare fake wars with fake armies. Fabriziodg91 (talk) 15:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

  • You have freedom of speech, but you mix the freedom of speech with authoritarian attitude in United Micronations which Belia will never agree.
  • Who are you listening if all members of UM said their position about ISIS, only Hashima showed their position against have a military action against ISIS, and your positions is more important than others? Is it how should work one organization?
  • We will not agree one authoritarian micronation like Hashima will teach us about democracy, when you want to have 100% of the power of micronations, you made electoral fraud in UM elections, and you created till 6 micronations fake to support yourself. 1 2 3 4 5 6
My user talk page is not the place for this dispute. Please continue it on the UM talk page. If anybody thinks that a micronation is fake, please provide me with the evidence for such and I will see if a Fantasy/Dubious template should be added. Austenasia (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
If you, Austenasia, can't solve this threat (because an user that vandalize the articles on MicroWiki and remove the freedom of speech to others is surely a threat), then i suggest you to deleted permanently the article of the United Micronations. The United Micronations has its official website and can fully operate from there. I suggest to delete permanently because i'm sure Belia will return to its edit warring and vandalism, and the article will turn into his fantasy/dubious/censurated version, that will not help the UM itself to be understood for the truth.

Hashima said that Hashima don't declare war to ISIS, not that everyone can't declare war to ISIS. Just you wasn't able, because the treaty that you signed, and that you broke declaring war. As how the treaty states, you got an expulsion after declaring war to someone (ISIS is an organization, terrorist but still organization, then you violated the treaty). By the way, also if those 6 should was mine, there are some points that you don't thinked about: 1) are all defunt micronations 2) none of this micronations voted into the elections, so please explain me how they supported Hashima in the elections, if they haven't voted?

I have protected the article. No more editing will be allowed for over a day. If Belia edits it again after that time is up, they will be given a temporary block if the edit is unconstructive. Now if you want to continue the debate amongst yourself, please take it to the UM talk page. Austenasia (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)