MicroWiki:Good articles

From MicroWiki, the micronational encyclopædia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Austenasia (talk | contribs) at 21:00, 1 October 2020. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
MW:GA

Good articles are considered to be the best articles on MicroWiki as determined by MicroWiki's editors. Before being listed as a good article, articles must be nominated and voted upon for accuracy, neutrality, comprehensiveness, structure and style. This project is designed to help improve article quality on MicroWiki and reward good article editing and creation. At present, there are 66 good articles out of a total of 22,092 articles in MicroWiki. A small green symbol (This symbol symbolizes good content on MicroWiki.) on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is of good quality.

Criteria

A good article is one that is:

  1. Well-written: its prose is engaging, coherent, clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. There should be a minimal number of red links.
  2. Comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details, is of substantial length but does not go into unnecessary detail, remaining focused on the main topic.
  3. Accurate: it is well-researched and its claims are verifiable and not in dispute.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Illustrated: it should, where possible, be illustrated with appropriate images with succinct captions.
  6. Well-structured: it should have a concise introduction that summarises the topic and a system of hierarchical section headings with a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.

Process

Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by asking an administrator. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter to deal with objections during the GA process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult the author and/or regular editors of the article prior to a nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

If a nominator feels that an article satisfies all the criteria, the article can be nominated by any user on the nomination page making sure that they provide the title of the article, a link to it and the signature of the nominating user. A user should only nominate one article each month. The article will then be reviewed by the community and voted on over a period of seven days after being nominated, with nominators and authors of the article being encouraged to respond to constructive criticism and to address objections promptly. While the number of votes in support or opposition are the main thing taken into account, the arguments on each side will also be considered. A nomination with several blank "support" votes and only a few "oppose" votes may still be rejected if those "oppose" votes make very good arguments against it.

Following the seven day period, an administrator will determine consensus of the community and it will either be approved or rejected. If an article is approved, the community deems that it satisfies the initial criteria. If an article is rejected, the articles does not satisfy the initial criteria and an explanation of why will usually be provided by the reviewing users. Rejected articles should only be nominated again after one month following the previous nomination, if progress has been made to improve the article since.

In the last week of each month, nominations which have been approved by an administrator either that month or the previous month will be voted on by the community. The approved nomination with the highest number of votes (with admin consensus providing a deciding vote in the case of a tie) will officially be listed as a Good Article.

Good Article status is thereby reserved for the very best of the best articles, with no more than one per month being granted the status.


Template

To use the good article template, add {{GA|revision=123456|date=24 October 2020}} to the top of the article. The correct revision and date are the ones that are most recent, just prior to the article being approved. For help on how to use the template correctly, contact an administrator.

Nominations

Aenderian Coast Guard

Nominator: Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 21:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Marks one year since the formal founding of the coast guard also its responsible for like 50% of the featured images. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 21:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT johann or smth (talk page) 00:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE 2/17 ≠ 50%, not even close. *it's. Billiam Bilson 13:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • NEUTRAL: I cant make my mind up on this one. The page is well referenced, and has decent presentation and use of templates.. but idk I can't place my finger on it.
    An articles age and whether its images are featured has nothing to do with GA however. Sertor (Chat) 13:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT The article is well expanded upon, I think that its worthy of good article status. Emperor Anthony I (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 03:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Ebenthal

Nominator: Arthur Brum (talk) 03:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The article is well-structure following Wikipedia's patterns on country articles, well-illustrated, it presents all of the micronation's relevant information with cohesion, it provide links to related articles, although not in a repetitive way, it provide sources. English errors were overwhelmingly or totally corrected. Arthur Brum (talk) 03:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT Karnia-Ruthenia (talk page) 09:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC) This article is well written and reports an impressive micronation with the potential to be one of the greatest of this decade among the micronations created in Latin America. Recognizing it as a Good Article transcends the obvious fact that the article is far superior to some other articles with the same label, but it is also a matter of fairness for a very interesting micronational project.
  • OPPOSE: It is without a doubt that the article is very well written. I however take issue with the fact that large swathes of the article are unreferenced, and as such the information present is unverifiable.
    If before the voting process is completed the article gets its references, this will be my number one candidate. Sertor (Chat) 13:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Sildavia 11:27 2 October 2020 (UTC) This is a very well written and detailed article, showing great micronational potential within the Brazilian and Latin American Sector.
  • SUPPORT Cobra Kai 16:30 2 October 2020 (UTC) The article is truly excellent, as it fully exposes the relevant information on micronation. Even if we not consider it to be a foreign-speaking micronation, its writing is very good. It complies with the integrality, to the point that its reading can be perfectly learned what is necessary from Ebenthal. He uses appropriate sources in this context, and none are even doubtful. Although it is understood that in this wiki the same heads of state collaborate many times, the article does not show a sezgo, and describes Ebenthal without exaggerating the qualities or importance of micronation. The images are excellent, and they illustrate correctly, without going too far. The landscapes were well chosen, and give the reader an idea of ​​the representativeness of territories, culture and personalities of the micronation. The order of the sections also seems very good to me, and beyond any doubt. I agree with user User:Sertor Valentinus that it would indeed be an even better article with more sources, hopefully external and in the press. However, if so, this article should also be on Wikipedia. But for a micronation wiki I think it deserves this nomination. An extra point of relevance is that this is a particularly good article on a micronation that is not English-speaking, which obviously contributes in diversity.

Finally, forgive my mistakes in grammar. This is not my mother tongue.

  • OPPOSE Though the article appears to be well expanded upon, the article has very few references, certain parts of the article are very obscure. Emperor Anthony I (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT I consider it to be a well-written article, with an adequate order, and whose reading is quite clear. Provides correct reporting of micronation. User:MarcoAntonioRino 17:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT I consider it to be a well-written, well-descriptive article, making all points and topics clearly and easily understandable for all the readers. Dhrubajyoti Roy 15:33 (IST), 08 October 2020
  • OPPOSE Not enough refrences —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusty (talkcontribs)
    • REJECTED 5:3 is not a sufficiently uniform consensus, and those opposed do make good points Austenasia (talk) 08:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Church of the Golden Road to Unlimited Devotion

Nominator:Citizen-Premier Sophia Albina (talk, 03:59, 2 October (EST)

This article is a well-written and detailed article on the Church of the Golden Road to Unlimited Devotion, a highly developed Church present within the Republic of Nordale and the Commonwealth of New Virginia. The antecedents to the creation of the Church culturally can be seen in the now Shoreline which was once Terentia within the Empire of Austenasia. This article documents a major accomplishment of micronational culture that I think is nearly unmatched within the community. Stella Blue I has put much effort and thought into the development of this religion which one can easily see within the article. For all of these reasons, I believe this article deserves to be a good article. Thank you for your consideration, my friends.

  • OPPOSE: A smallish article with merely 2 references isn't exactly GA material. Sertor (Chat) 13:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE As Sertor said, even these aren't references. Aenopia (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Emperor Anthony I (talk) 03:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE While the article is by no means bad, it is not exactly exponentially good. Some sentences could be worded better, and it could due with minor grammar edits. It could also due with some images if possible, as well as references (although they are not required as some editors think!) which would really complete it. Minor expansion, such as its history, could also help. Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Zed Zarel  My Talk Page  Contribs  4:19 p.m., 4 October 2020 (UTC+1)

Kingdom of West Sayville

Nominator: Sertor (Chat) 09:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I believe the article is well-structured, well referenced... and just generally a possible candidate for nomination.

  • OPPOSE Lots of [citation needed] marks in one area, not too many photos and some sections can be expanded. Aenopia (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE There's very scant information in certains sections of this article, which definitely needs to be expanded upon. Emperor Anthony I (talk) 03:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE As above; looks pretty stuby! Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Zed Zarel  My Talk Page  Contribs  4:20 p.m., 4 October 2020 (UTC+1)
  • OPPOSE Looks to stuby and could use way more citations User:Dusty

Operation Free Shelly and Fish Sticks

Nominator: leon | talk to me 19:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I think that the page is quite good for what happened on that day- in my view it should be granted GA status.

National symbols of New Eiffel

Nominator: Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Zed Zarel  My Talk Page  Contribs  3:41 a.m. (0341), 7 October 2020 (UTC+1)

In my honest opinion the article is definitely well expanded upon, uses exceptional spelling and grammar, and has plenty of images, references and detail.

Isaiah Burdette

Nominator: User:Dusty, 7 October 2020.
  • SUPPORT: Good well expanded article with many images and a decent amount of citations —Preceding unsigned comment added by dusty (talkcontribs)
  • OPPOSE: Gonna be honest here, the article is all over the place. Large chunks are unreferenced, and it looks like it needs a bit of copyediting. Sertor (Chat) 17:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Definitely needs a copyedit. Aenopia (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment: I added many more citations and referenced the hell out of the article i ask that you re-consider your vote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusty (talkcontribs)
    • I just reviewed the article. A number of citations, for a example for the September Florania election... are literally just links to other MicroWiki pages. Sertor (Chat) 20:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: To be completely honest, the writing can get pretty repetitive in some sections, there's quite a few grammatical errors, and there's a bit of unnecessary information. I think copyediting and getting rid of unnecessary bits would serve the article well. Player Piano 19:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)<
  • OPPOSE Emperor Anthony I (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Huginn & Muninn

Nominator: User:GS Chris, 11 October 2020.

Comment by nominator (optional). Crows are epic, articles are epic, what more is there to say?

  • OPPOSE A good-sized article for an animal, however, I would like to see some references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mh06941 (talkcontribs) 04:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I really like this, definitely long enough and with enough images, however the grammar can be mildly improved and some sentences can be worded better. With these minor fixes, this can easily become a GA. Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Zed Zarel  My Talk Page  Contribs  12:46 p.m., 16 October 2020 (UTC+1)
  • SUPPORT Isaiah (Chat)

Grand Theft Auto V affair

Nominator: Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 14:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Comment by nominator (optional) the microwar to end all microwars Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 14:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT Jamez (talk page) 15 October 2020
  • SUPPORT leon | talk to me 14:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Sertor (Chat) 14:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • COMMENT @Sertor Valentinus: any feedback? Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 16:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Comment: The article is given the "silly things" tag, describing the page as "MicroWiki is a serious encyclopaedia for micronations, however from time to time, non namespace pages, such as MicroWiki:Unusual articles have popped up, which are meant to be comedic. It's good to laugh every now and then, and most humor articles don't cause much damage to MicroWiki as a website." Given the article itself asking readers not to take it seriously, I feel this alone would disqualify it from GA status. Sertor (Chat) 17:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
      • Comment @Sertor Valentinus: Thank you for your concern. The topic of an article is not present in the criteria listed, as such should not have anything to do with GA. The article fulfills the present citeria in these ways, in my opinion, as well as being well referenced considering the topic. If though, the article does not fulfill a criterion, feel free to respond to this message and I will respond to you with an explanation, an objection, or I will fix such error. Thank you. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 17:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE No just no. Isaiah
  • SUPPORT johann. (talk page) 21:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • COMMENT Please add feedback when drafting your censusious for article above; I personally believe that this article fulfills all citerion listed on GA, those being
  1. Well-written, the article outlines the background of the event, describes the affair in detail, as well as international reactions and aftermath, enough for an affair like this, at the same time having correct reference placement (i.e. reference after period), and correct grammar and spelling, as well as nearly every statement referenced in some sort,
  2. Comprehensive, the wikipage details the affair leaving no details but being reasonable in its size.
  3. Accurate, you've got various references detailing what GTA V is, letters sent to leaders, messages, etc.
  4. Neutral, a majority of POVs are factored in this article
  5. Illustrated, has images of Leon's account playing GTA, Leon planning to re-install the game, that letter I sent to Trudeau and the M rating for which the ESRB rated the game. This supports the article and at the same time doesn't overwhelm the article.
  6. Well-structured, goes from background, to the main event, to aftermath and reactions. Enough headings for the article for an incident like this

I will be perfectly happy to responding your feedback to the article and I'll respond with an objection, an explanation, or will correct such error if possible. Thank you! Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 01:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT Well-written, highly detailed and contains a lot of images and sources. GDC Navārdia (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT For while I usually wouldn't support an article with such focus as this, this article is clearly well written with lots of images and references to back it up - in some senses better than some pre-existing GA articles. Empire of Aenopia flag.png Logan (Aenopia)  Terry Tibbs talk to me  Look at what I've done. Empire of Aenopia flag.png 18:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Regelis

Nominator: Soaringmoon (talk) 01:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I've just done a week's worth of substantial editing to the page. I annotated what I could the best I can, and will likely be annotating the article further as I read through it for spelling and grammar I may have missed. As it is rather long.

  • OPPOSE Not structured well (i.e. using heading 1 instead of heading 2), goes too in-depth on various things including Ministries and Relationships which could be separated. Can easily be improved and will be a good tender for GA! Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 02:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
    • COMMENT Sections heading depth was easy enough to fix, that is already done. As for ministries, culture, and army content, do you think that it would benefit by being moved to their own separate pages? Maybe including a navigation box? SoaringMoon (talk) 02:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
      • COMMENT Yes, this is about a general overview of the nation, not about what is the remistace ministry. I'll also recommend shortening the starting sentence (e.g. removing what Technocracy is). Furthermore, I'll also recommend you to add references to areas like Economy, Government, etc, where there are few. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10 | 04:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
        • COMMENT I trimmed some serious fat on the article. Can you look at it now, and give me some feedback on what else I should change? I have excepted the fact that I will have to submit this as a GA at some later time. SoaringMoon (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE The article goes into far too much detail about some things that would be better suited to a website or in some cases a different page. For example I wouldn't say that the advantages and disadvantages of the currency section is necessary on the main page, neither is relationships. Also the head of state section doesn't appear to be completed, with almost all of the table full of N/A. I'd say in that case you would be better off mentioning the positions rather than filling a table with N/A. The mission statement section is also rather biased and unnecessary imo. For while I feel like this page isn't ready for GA status yet with lots of improvement and maybe even sifting through to choose what needs its own page/is very useful for a wiki page it could reach GA status. Empire of Aenopia flag.png Logan (Aenopia)  Terry Tibbs talk to me  Look at what I've done. Empire of Aenopia flag.png 11:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • NEUTRAL The article is detailed, but I feel that some sections can be looked into. Like History can be shifted above Basic laws (which might come into the Government/Parliament section), moreover, Climate seems to be a sub-section of Holidays, you can look into it. Oritsu.me (talk)| 09:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Isaiah (Chat)

Archives

Statistics

Article Author Nominator Nominated Approved Votes[1] Approver
Federal Republic of St.Charlie Cajak Fishy 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status)
5/5/0 Fishy
Observergate SerCenKing Cajak 2010-09-16 2010-09-27 5/4/1 Fishy
Þeûdspråxa Swena Aldrich Lucas 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status)
5/5/0 Fishy
Students' Isocratic Oligarchy of Yabloko Aldrich Lucas Asam79 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later deleted)
3/3/0 Fishy
Republic of Petorio Ramtak619 Fishy 2010-09-27 2010-10-05 6/4/2 Aldrich Lucas
Cheslovian Federation Kaznia2 Fishy 2010-10-13 2010-10-17
(Later stripped of GA status)
3/3/0 Aldrich Lucas
Technological Federation of Erephisia Billyneil Aldrich Lucas 2010-12-09 2010-12-15 0/0/0 Aldrich Lucas
Kingdom of Überstadt Überstadt Aldrich Lucas 2011-01-24 2011-01-30 5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Secundomia Parker I Parker I 2011-03-24 2011-04-01 4/3/1 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Ultamiya AuburnAttack21 AuburnAttack21 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 3/2/1 Aldrich Lucas
MicroWiki Influence Survey Aldrich Lucas Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Federated Republics of A1 Fishy Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-14 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
St.Charlie Armed Forces Cajak Fishy 2011-04-17 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Grand Duchy of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-04-28 2011-05-08 1/1/0 Aldrich Lucas
Nick Maggiore Cajak Cajak 2011-05-30 2011-06-06 13/13/0 Aldrich Lucas
Riley Small Rsmall Rsmall 2011-07-03 2011-07-11 5/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Niels of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-07-14 2011-07-22 6/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Declan I, II & V Austenasia Austenasia 2011-07-16 2011-07-23 8/8/0 Aldrich Lucas
Berinese Confederation Irojas Irojas 2011-07-17 2011-07-24 10/8/2 Aldrich Lucas
Prsänëan Credit James Wilary James Wilary 2011-08-09 2011-08-16 6/6/0 Aldrich Lucas
Heinrich Schneider SerCenKing Cajak 2011-08-29 2011-09-07 7/7/0 Cajak
Flag of Berin Mokke Mokke 2011-09-22 2011-09-29
(Later deleted)
5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Havnesgade-Amager Havnegade-Amager Havnegade-Amager 2012-04-02 2012-04-09 7/6/1 SiroccanGov
Union of Nemkhav Communists Vitcash Vitcash 2012-04-07 2012-04-14 3/3/0 Fishy
Juclandia Dozzer X Jeremy Oakes 2012-05-08 2012-06-27 4/3/1 Jeremy Oakes
Grand Unified Micronational Austenasia BraydenYates 2012-06-26 2013-01-01 8/7/0 James Wilary
Prsänëan language James Wilary James Wilary 2012-07-28 2013-01-01 7/4/0 James Wilary
Bowie QuentinWyvern Austenasia 2012-12-17 2013-01-01 3/3/0 James Wilary
Federal Commonwealth of Sirocco SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/4/2 James Wilary
National Centre of Computing (Sirocco) SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Alexander Reinhardt Cajak James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Empire of Austenasia Austenasia James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/6/0 James Wilary
Foreign relations of Indokistan Nabil nordamdie James Wilary 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status)
2/2/0 James Wilary
Yablokogate Numerous SiroccanGov 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status)
1/1/0 James Wilary
Inyo, Prsänëa James Wilary James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Organisation of Active Micronations Fishy James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Tiana Puggy Puggy 2013-08-04 2014-05-29 1/1/0 Austenasia
Ashukov Federation JosephKennedy JosephKennedy 2014-06-18 2014-06-23 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Adam I of Überstadt Überstadt Überstadt 2014-07-12 2014-07-31 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Democratic Republic of Leylandiistan Leylandiistan Leylandiistan 2015-01-07 2015-05-25 1/1/0 Austenasia
James Stewart FrancisvilleAdmin Sebastian Linden 2016-01-01 2016-02-24 3/3/0 Austenasia
Jonathan I, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Førvania 2016-02-09 2016-05-07 3/3/0 Luxor
Kermadecia DNSgov DNSgov 2016-05-30 2016-06-11
(Later stripped of GA status)
2/2/0 Austenasia
Reylan Imperial Triumvirate Taeglan I Nihilus Kit 2016-06-05 2016-07-24 2/2/0 Austenasia
Deva Victrix Austenasia Austenasia 2016-12-05 2016-12-15 2/2/0 Austenasia
Empire of Pavlov Deniz Deniz 2016-12-15 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Sabia and Verona Ricky Ricky 2016-12-21 2017-01-07 4/4/0 Austenasia
Abeldane Empire MilitarmiaGov Mahuset 2016-12-27 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Florenia Nathan Nathan 2017-01-29 2017-02-20 2/2/0 Austenasia
Democratic Union of British States Bob Christ Bob Christ 2017-05-26 2017-07-05 3/3/0 Austenasia
Empire of Adammia EmperorAdamI EmperorAdamI 2017-07-13 2017-08-01 5/5/0 Austenasia
Abeldane federal election, August 2017 Numerous Ricky 2017-08-31 2017-09-07 4/4/0 Twain
Essian Commonwealth Twain Twain 2017-09-07 2017-09-25 4/4/0 Überstadt
Democratic Duchy of Francisville FrancisvilleArchive FrancisvilleArchive 2018-06-05 2018-07-30 2/2/0 Austenasia
Royal coat of arms of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2018-12-15 2019-01-16 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Florence AnthonyClark AnthonyClark 2018-01-10 2019-02-04
(Later stripped of GA status)
1/1/0 Austenasia
Tsardom of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland 2019-04-02 2019-04-27 3/3/0 Austenasia
Flag Model of Theodian history Swena Swena 2019-05-09 2019-06-18 3/3/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Gradonia William GF Wilson William GF Wilson 2019-08-07 2019-08-20 3/3/0 Austenasia
Principality of New Eiffel Z. Luna Skye MissEDconexion 2019-09-20 2019-10-05 2/2/0 Austenasia
Esmond III, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Malinovia 2019-09-27 2019-10-17 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Eiffel Main Route 1 Z. Luna Skye Z. Luna Skye 2019-11-11 2019-11-20 6/5/1 Austenasia
Adam I, Emperor of Adammia EmperorAdamI NickRandouler 2019-11-12 2019-12-10 3/2/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia 2019-11-13 2019-12-11 2/2/0 Austenasia
Principality of Montescano Deniz Deniz 2019-12-10 2019-12-29 2/2/0 Austenasia
Fifth Aenderian Republic Jaydenfromcanada Jaydenfromcanada 2020-01-02 2020-01-23 9/6/3 Austenasia
Empire of Aenopia Aenopia Aenopia 2020-01-09 2020-02-03 4/3/1 MissEDconexion
Kingdom of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2020-02-10 2020-02-19 4/4/0 Vulture001
New Llandudno Aenopia Aenopia 2020-02-09 2020-02-23 3/3/0 Austenasia
New Leeds Z. Luna Skye Z. Luna Skye 2020-07-23 2020-07-24 3/3/0 Austenasia
Federal Republic of Francisville FrancisvilleArchive FrancisvilleArchive 2020-07-11 2020-09-02 5/5/0 Austenasia
William I of Gradonia William GF Wilson William GF Wilson 2020-09-02 2020-10-01 8/7/1 Austenasia
  1. Total/Support/Oppose

Good article authors and nominators

User Authored Nominated
No. Articles No. Articles
Aenopia 2 2
Aldrich Lucas 2 5
AnthonyClark 1 1
Asam79 1
AuburnAttack21 1 1
Austenasia 6 3
Billyneil 1
Bob Christ 1 1
BraydenYates 1
Cajak 4 3
Catherine of Kohlandia 1 1
Deniz 2 2
DNSgov 1 1
Dozzer X 1
EmperorAdamI 2 1
Fishy 2 4
Flandrensis 2 2
Førvania 1
FrancisvilleAdmin 3 2
Havnegade-Amager 1 1
Irojas 1 1
James Wilary 3 9
Jaydenfromcanada 1 1
Jeremy Oakes 1
JosephKennedy 1 1
Kaznia2 1
KingdomOfBaustralia 2 2
Kit 1
Leylandiistan 1 1
Mahuset 1
Malinovia 1
MilitarmiaGov 1
MissEDconexion 1 1
Mokke 1 1
Nabil nordamdie 1
Nathan 1 1
NickRandouler 1
Parker I 1 1
People's Republic of Phokland 1 1
Puggy 1 1
QuentinWyvern 1
Ricky 1 2
Rsmall 1 1
Ramtak619 1
SerCenKing 2
Sebastian Linden 1
SiroccanGov 2 1
Swena 2 1
Taeglan I Nihilus 1
Twain 1 1
Überstadt 1 1
Vitcash 1 1
William GF Wilson 2 1
Z. Luna Skye 3 2


Related articles