MicroWiki:Good articles

From MicroWiki, the micronational encyclopædia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MissEDconexion (talk | contribs) at 21:19, 24 February 2020. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
MW:GA

Good articles are considered to be the best articles on MicroWiki as determined by MicroWiki's editors. Before being listed as a good article, articles must be nominated and voted upon for accuracy, neutrality, comprehensiveness, structure and style. This project is designed to help improve article quality on MicroWiki and reward good article editing and creation. At present, there are 61 good articles out of a total of 19,465 articles in MicroWiki. A small green symbol (This symbol symbolizes good content on MicroWiki.) on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is of good quality.

Criteria

A good article is one that is:

  1. Well-written: its prose is engaging, coherent, clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. There should be a minimal number of red links.
  2. Comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details, is of substantial length but does not go into unnecessary detail, remaining focused on the main topic.
  3. Accurate: it is well-researched and its claims are verifiable and not in dispute.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Illustrated: it should, where possible, be illustrated with appropriate images with succinct captions.
  6. Well-structured: it should have a concise introduction that summarises the topic and a system of hierarchical section headings with a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.

Process

Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by asking Austenasia, Joseph Kennedy, or another administrator. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter to deal with objections during the GA process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult the author and/or regular editors of the article prior to a nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

If a nominator feels that an article satisfies all the criteria, the article can be nominated by any user on the nomination page making sure that they provide the title of the article, a link to it and the signature of the nominating user. The article will then be reviewed by the community and voted on over a period of seven days after being nominated, with nominators and authors of the article being encouraged to respond to constructive criticism and to address objections promptly. While the number of votes in support or opposition are the main thing taken into account, the arguments on each side will also be considered.

Following the seven day period, Austenasia, Joseph Kennedy, or another administrator will determine consensus of the community and it will either be approved or rejected. If an article is approved, the community deems that it satisfies the criteria and it will be listed as a good article. If an article is rejected, the articles does not satisfy the criteria and an explanation of why will usually be provided by the reviewing users. Rejected articles should only be nominated again after one month following the previous nomination, if progress has been made to improve the article since.

Template

To use the good article template, add {{GA|revision=123456|date=1 April 2020}} to the top of the article. The correct revision and date are the ones that are most recent, just prior to the article being approved. For help on how to use the template correctly, contact an administrator.

Nominations

NOTICE

Good Article nominations will be temporarily closed until June. For some time now we have been getting far more applications than this system was ever set up to handle. There is a huge backlog on articles being featured on the Main Page, and most nominations are going weeks if not months before an admin gets a chance to look at them. By June, a new GA system will hopefully have been worked out.


Fifth Aenderian Republic

Nominator: User:Jaydenfromcanada 6:28PM 2 January 2019 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 3:20PM, 5 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE For such a large page I would expect more citations. There are areas I feel could be condensed and others that could be expanded greatly, such as an expansion of the foreign affairs section and condensing of the history section User: Gb555 8 jan 2020 3:32pm
    • COMMENT Hey, thanks for the feedback! This is quite the average amount of citations for a page of that size in MicroWiki at least, but at the final note it is your opinion and I will respect that. Regarding the expansion of the foreign affairs section, it is that short for a certain reason; Aenderia does not have many diplomatic affairs with other nations (though we are improving!) and for the history section, Aenderia has a lot of information; a majority of the information in the history section is already condensed. Thank you through for the feedback! -User:Jaydenfromcanada 12:11AM 8 January 2020 (ET)
  • SUPPORT --ThatMLGDorito (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT --Simmascoppe 05:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE So close! Just a few spelling mistakes and things I would phrase better. For example, "It failed pretty badly and thus was unsuccessful" could simply be "The impeachment was unsuccessful", and if it was a known event for being a failure you could state so after that. I forgot which part it was in otherwise I would fix it, but somewhere it says "undemocratic-ally" but undemocratically is a word. Other than that, sources? Check. Images? Check. Nicely expanded? Check. So close!
    • COMMENT Hey, thanks for the feedback! All issues should be fixed. User:Jaydenfromcanada 11:48PM 17 January 2020
  • SUPPORT Chau Khang (talk) 11:04am, 22 January 2020 (ICT)
  • SUPPORT --Emperor Anthony I (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT meets the criteria. -ricky sup? 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Definitely a good article, I just find the formatting around some places to be quite awkward. I would remove the history in the etymology section, make the formatting of images in the Lycon's First Term, the Second Aenderese Political Crisis: Resigning Crisis, the The Fifth Republic and the Degense sections a bit better, look for a way to better represent text conversations in Discord (an example of a template I'm working on for conversation with MSN messenger is located here), remove the history in the Parties and Election section, replace the "Коммунистическая Партия Республики Андерии" name with a translation and that in small next beneath it, merge the Official Name, English Name, French Name, Vietnamese Name, Russian Name and Spanish Name columns into one, remove the Special Administrative Region and Federal Dominion sections and make the National Holidays section a bit better. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
    • COMMENT Thanks for the feedback, will definitely take a look at some of your recommendations. Regarding your statement with the Коммунистическая Партия Республики Андерии party, that is the official name. It does not uses an English name. User:Jaydenfromcanada 22 January 2020
    • APPROVED Austenasia (talk) 10:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Arms of the Aenderese Republic

Nominator: User:Jaydenfromcanada 6:28PM 2 January 2019 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 3:20PM, 5 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE I will say that I love the design of the Arms very nice! However I would expect more information and citations if you're going to do a page like this. User:Gb55 8 Jan 2020 3:33pm
  • SUPPORT --Simmascoppe 05:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Chau Khang (talk) 11:04am, 22 January 2020 (ICT)
  • OPPOSE while it is a well-written and well-structured article, some of the formatting makes it look rather awkward and there just isn't enough content to fill all the sections properly. -ricky sup? 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE as above Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Grand Republic of Cycoldia

Nominator: User:Summi Imperatoris 17:20 07 January 2019 (CST)
  • OPPOSE: There is not enough citations on the page. The whole page needs fine tuning and expansion. The section regarding 'Entry into the Nation' is no needed and can be Incorporated into other areas of the page. Also the pages formatting needs a re-tweak, it doesn't flow very well. I do appreciate the infobox that is very well put together. But overall not worthy of GA status in its current form User: Gb555 8 Jan 20 3:26pm
  • SUPPORT: Nice article, good amount of references and information. Would add a photo in the history section if possible. -User:Jaydenfromcanada 2:30AM 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 4:15PM, 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Good article, non-biased, straight to the point, and written clearly -User:Luke825015
  • SUPPORT meets the criteria. -ricky sup? 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Excessive details in some places and awkward formatting in others. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
    • REJECTED A difficult one, as it's really not a bad article by any means. However, the two who voted in opposition raised some good points and articles with a 2:1 support:oppose ratio have almost always been rejected in the past. I noticed a few other things, too; taking the Diplomacy section as an example, the statement "Cycoldia has been recognised by the United States Department of Education" must be changed to something like "Cycoldia claims to have been recognised...", some of the nations have been given flags and some haven't, and the Entry into the Nation section is written like an advert rather than an article. Overall not bad, but needs some work imho. Austenasia (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Republic of Viadalvia

Nominator: --A chap from Phokland (talk) 14:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: Nice amount of photos and information, but there are no references, a photo is broken, and a few grammar mistakes. User:Jaydenfromcanada 2:24AM 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE: A bit too much red links Tsar Stefan I (talk) 4:13PM, 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE Red links, grammar mistakes, and none of the sentences even have periods. Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Enough red links to even drive me off, grammar issues, and around enough periods only to supply one chap for 5 milliseconds. HIM Christina I of Cycoldia (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: It looks as if it was poorly translated from another language, too many red links and whomever wrote this must have some sort of full stop phobia. Aenopia (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE as above. -ricky sup? 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Empire of Aenopia

Nominator: Aenopia (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2020 (UCT)
  • SUPPORT: Nice amount of information and photos. Work on your references, otherwise it is a pretty good article! -User:Jaydenfromcanada 2:26AM 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 4:13PM, 10 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE There isn't exactly a bias as such, but sections of the article don't read neutral. I would also like to see an expansion of the History and Government sections. User:Gb555 12 Jan 20 10:20am
  • SUPPORT Good article. There are a few areas I'd change but that are fully allowed within the criteria. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Small changes needed, overall very good. Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Halfasinteresting-stania

Nomintator:User:Jaydenfromcanada 3:00AM, 10 January 2020 (EST) a behemoth amount of information for a state lasting less than 5 seconds

Union of Millania and New Granada

Nomintator: Nicolás Millán 4:38PM, 12 January 2020 (CST) I believe we're ready.
  • SUPPORT a man has fallen into the river in lego city User:Jaydenfromcanada 12:08 AM 15 January 2020
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 2:51PM, 15 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE Fix the weatherbox. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
    • COMMENT Fixed, and I redid the geography section and added tons of links where needed. Nicolás Millán 8:48PM, 26 January 2020 (CST)
      • REJECTED: I'm sorry, not enough feedback. Overall not that bad but I do agree that a bit more information could be added--Guess I never Miss (talk) 04:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Ebenthal

--MissED the mark (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
NOTE: this will be my last proposal for a while.

J16

Nominator: Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC). Comment: Made a lot of changes since the last nomination.
  • SUPPORT a man has fallen into the river in lego city User:Jaydenfromcanada 11:08 AM 20 January 2020
  • OPPOSE Too short. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
    • COMMENT It is slightly longer than the shortest good article (within twenty bytes). And is, in my opinion, expanded upon enough. Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Not bad. --Emperor Anthony I (talk) 02:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Good article Ari Telford (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Rather short, however informative nevertheless. Aenopia (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE I do not believe it is important enough for GA. Remember, the ga status is meant to demonstrate the best that the wiki has to offer and i feel as though this has been forgotten in recent times. --Guess I never Miss (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    • REJECTED I'm sorry, I just thing that this particular article is too short and miscellaneous to be GA at this time.--Guess I never Miss (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Repeal of GA status of Grand Unified Micronational

Nominator: User:Jaydenfromcanada) 8:03PM 24 January 2020 (EST). Am I legally bilnd or is there no references? Also, should have more photos imo
  • OPPOSE Articles do not require references. And in any case, references can easily be added; removing and re-adding GA status would just be an unneeded hassle. Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Ari Telford (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: References are not required. Tsar Stefan I (talk) 9:58PM, 24 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE as above -ricky sup? 08:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Fails the "accurate" criterium via its lack of references. Mahuset (Emiel Sebastiaan Hardy, also known as Oxocero) (talk) 14:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Articles do not always need references. Other good articles do not have them, we can add them in the future but taking it away wouldn't help. NickRandouler) (talk) 05:42 PM, January 25, 2020 (EST)
  • RENOUCED fixed thanks to the epic Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I)
  • CLOSED Repeal denied due to popular vote, and references being added. cameron (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
  • COMMENT I call BS Cameron, you cannot just close a thread, you either APPROVE or REJECT. I get this is rejected but saying "COSED" just seems like a poor choice of words in my opinion. Also this is the GUM so obviously there will be discourse (this last part is drected at the proposer). --Guess I never Miss (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • JONATHAN gave me the ability. Take it up with him, not me. "BS" smh cameron (talk) 02:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Kingdom of Baustralia

Nominator: His (Imperial) Majesty, John I by the Grace of God of Baustralia, and the Dominions, Emperor of Tentacion 17:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC). I've improved the article since my second-last nomination. The last nomination I don't believe was seen by many.

Kingdom of Coria

Nominator: NikolaJovanovic (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Great article imho.

Nikola I of Coria

Nominator: NikolaJovanovic (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Great article imho.
  • OPPOSE There's no references, no worthy pictures or interactive items (graphs, tables, ect.) and there's nearly nothing there. Aenopia (talk 19:22, 26 January 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE Tsar Stefan I (talk) 2:55PM, 26 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE Stuuuuuuuub Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 02:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE: Add a picture or two, then we can talk about GA status.--Guess I never Miss (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Ned Gunderson

Nominator: NikolaJovanovic (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Great article imho.
  • OPPOSE Very little on the page, almost no images and no references. Aenopia (talk 19:22, 26 January 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE Tsar Stefan I (talk) 2:55PM, 26 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE Stub Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE stubby sized Jaydenfromcanada (talk) 01:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT I like it though my only recommendation would be to add an image.--Guess I never Miss (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Small, not much told about the person other than offices, religion and awards... His (Imperial) Majesty, John I by the Grace of God of Baustralia, and the Dominions, Emperor of Tentacion 21:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • REJECTED Stubby! cameron (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Rushymia (original kingdom)

Nominator: NikolaJovanovic (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Great article imho.
  • OPPOSE Literally only has one image, no references and has a biased tone. Also it literally consists primarily of a History section and an awards section (a half-arsed one at that). No way is this GA worthy. Aenopia (talk 19:25, 26 January 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE Tsar Stefan I (talk) 2:54PM, 26 January 2020 (EST)
  • OPPOSE as above Jaydenfromcanada (talk) 05:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Union of Millania and New Granada

Nomintator: Nicolás Millán 10:54PM, 6 February 2020 (CST)
  • SUPPORT (Please if you support consider giving feedback) Very well-written and expanded upon, a generous amount of references, and a nice amount of images. There is some minor sentences which could be phrased better and in my opinion all I would add is another image or two but it is not needed. Z. Luna Skye (Prince Zarel I) (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Austin Jaax (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Tsar Stefan I (talk) 10:44PM, 6 February 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT FTFcz (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Aenopia (talk) 19:36, 9 Febuary 2020 (UCT)
  • SUPPORT Has a perfect amount of information, and at some parts which are kinda short, it has separate articles for, so that can be excused Anthony Dickson (talk 05:52, 10 February (EET)
  • OPPOSE A generally good article with many pictures and detailed sections. The issue is, with a page as expansive and detailed as this, it only has 14 references, half of those (7) are statements relating to documents, bodies, and areas which the reader does not have access to. William I (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2020 (CST)

Új Repülő

Nominator: Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Prince Zarel I  My Talk Page  Contribs  01:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Good information, used it as a template for my Hui City article. SovietWeeb (talk) 15:15 February 2020 (CST)
  • SUPPORT Very well written and engaging as per usual Zarel, I also used this to help me create the New Llandudno article. Aenopia (talk 19:54, 9 February 2020 (UCT)
  • SUPPORT really nicely written, good information and images too. -Anthony Dickson (talk) 05:52, 10 February (EET)
  • SUPPORT FTFcz (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Looks great, anything New Eiffelic is great NickRandouler (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Well structured. Emperor Anthony I (talk) 05:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

New Llandudno

Nominator: Aenopia (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2020 (UCT)
  • SUPPORT honestly amazingly written, tons of information, images. I believe it meets the criteria. Anthony Dickson (talk) 05:52, 10 February (EET)
  • SUPPORT FTFcz (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Looks great, a good amount of information for a city! NickRandouler (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2020 (EST)

Kingdom of Baustralia (No. 2)

Nominator: His Majesty John I by the Grace of God of Baustralia King, Emperor of Ostreum (talk · email) 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC). I've improved the article since my third-last nomination. The last two nominations I don't believe are being seen, sadly.
  • OPPOSE Decently written, images are perfect, and the references are nice. And although it is not bad by any means, I feel like it does not really qualify for GA status; nine red links, and some areas could be written better, for example "... there are currently thirteen administrative divisions of Baustralia, or provinces, and number 82 in population ..." unless the number changes very often it should ideally not have 'currently', and I feel like "and number 82 in population" should just be "and a total population of 82". Just my thoughts however. --Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Prince Zarel I  My Talk Page  Contribs  05:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
@Z. Luna Skye: I've followed through with your suggestions. Would you wish to re-review? His Majesty John I by the Grace of God of Baustralia King, Emperor of Ostreum (talk · email) 15:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I really enjoy this article anytime i see it. The page has to be one of the best if not the only good written article on this wiki. At the moment the article has a few grammatical mistakes around the article. In conculsion if fixes are made i see no reason for this to not to get GA status in the future -Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
    • Changed to SUPPORT Changes were made and fixed. -Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
@Cookieman1.1.1: I ran the article through Grammarly to remove these mistakes! His Majesty John I by the Grace of God of Baustralia King, Emperor of Ostreum (talk · email) 15:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT As stated above, corrections were made. I see no reason why not to add this page. -Guess I never Miss (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Certainly improved. Tsar Stefan I (talk) 2:13PM, 12 February 2020 (EST)
    • APPROVED Adding tags now! cameron (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

TOES

Nominator: Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Prince Zarel I  My Talk Page  Contribs  2:55 am (01:55), 13 February 2020. References, well-written, I think it qualifies.
  • SUPPORT What Zarel stated above. --ThatMLGDorito (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE It is well written and all but I'm not sure if it should be taken seriously or not. It does use a good amount of refrences however some seem like 'filler refrences' that do not actually provide support to the validity of the article. The seriousness of this too makes it hard too. Especially with the banned members part and the validity of that, and all of the blue links. Yes blue links are good but I feel like in some parts its an over load. Someone could probably persuade me and change my mind but what I have to say. NickRandouler (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Lots of references, pictures to complement article and overall a goog article. Aenopia (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE No. Austenasia (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Saspearian Declaration of Independence

Nominator: Emperor Anthony I (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Quite well made. Tsar Stefan I (talk) 9:20PM, 18 February 2020 (EST)
  • SUPPORT Well written, good amount of references, and overall a very good article. Flag of New Eiffel.svg/Royal coat of arms of New Eiffel.svg Prince Zarel I  My Talk Page  Contribs  3:19 PM (15:19), 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Too many grammatical mistakes, unfortunately. Otherwise not bad! Austenasia (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Indonesian sector

Nominator: Nabil nordamdie (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE There are a few grammar mistakes and very few references for an article its size. Aenopia (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2020 (UCT)
  • OPPOSE As above Austenasia (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Archives

Statistics

Article Author Nominator Nominated Approved Votes[1] Approver
Federal Republic of St.Charlie Cajak Fishy 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status)
5/5/0 Fishy
Observergate SerCenKing Cajak 2010-09-16 2010-09-27 5/4/1 Fishy
Þeûdspråxa Swena Aldrich Lucas 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status)
5/5/0 Fishy
Students' Isocratic Oligarchy of Yabloko Aldrich Lucas Asam79 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later deleted)
3/3/0 Fishy
Republic of Petorio Ramtak619 Fishy 2010-09-27 2010-10-05 6/4/2 Aldrich Lucas
Cheslovian Federation Kaznia2 Fishy 2010-10-13 2010-10-17
(Later stripped of GA status)
3/3/0 Aldrich Lucas
Technological Federation of Erephisia Billyneil Aldrich Lucas 2010-12-09 2010-12-15 0/0/0 Aldrich Lucas
Kingdom of Überstadt Überstadt Aldrich Lucas 2011-01-24 2011-01-30 5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Secundomia Parker I Parker I 2011-03-24 2011-04-01 4/3/1 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Ultamiya AuburnAttack21 AuburnAttack21 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 3/2/1 Aldrich Lucas
MicroWiki Influence Survey Aldrich Lucas Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Federated Republics of A1 Fishy Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-14 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
St.Charlie Armed Forces Cajak Fishy 2011-04-17 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Grand Duchy of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-04-28 2011-05-08 1/1/0 Aldrich Lucas
Nick Maggiore Cajak Cajak 2011-05-30 2011-06-06 13/13/0 Aldrich Lucas
Riley Small Rsmall Rsmall 2011-07-03 2011-07-11 5/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Niels of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-07-14 2011-07-22 6/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Declan I, II & V Austenasia Austenasia 2011-07-16 2011-07-23 8/8/0 Aldrich Lucas
Berinese Confederation Irojas Irojas 2011-07-17 2011-07-24 10/8/2 Aldrich Lucas
Prsänëan Credit James Wilary James Wilary 2011-08-09 2011-08-16 6/6/0 Aldrich Lucas
Heinrich Schneider SerCenKing Cajak 2011-08-29 2011-09-07 7/7/0 Cajak
Flag of Berin Mokke Mokke 2011-09-22 2011-09-29
(Later deleted)
5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Havnesgade-Amager Havnegade-Amager Havnegade-Amager 2012-04-02 2012-04-09 7/6/1 SiroccanGov
Union of Nemkhav Communists Vitcash Vitcash 2012-04-07 2012-04-14 3/3/0 Fishy
Juclandia Dozzer X Jeremy Oakes 2012-05-08 2012-06-27 4/3/1 Jeremy Oakes
Grand Unified Micronational Austenasia BraydenYates 2012-06-26 2013-01-01 8/7/0 James Wilary
Prsänëan language James Wilary James Wilary 2012-07-28 2013-01-01 7/4/0 James Wilary
Bowie QuentinWyvern Austenasia 2012-12-17 2013-01-01 3/3/0 James Wilary
Federal Commonwealth of Sirocco SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/4/2 James Wilary
National Centre of Computing (Sirocco) SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Alexander Reinhardt Cajak James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Empire of Austenasia Austenasia James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/6/0 James Wilary
Foreign relations of Indokistan Nabil nordamdie James Wilary 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status)
2/2/0 James Wilary
Yablokogate Numerous SiroccanGov 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status)
1/1/0 James Wilary
Inyo, Prsänëa James Wilary James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Organisation of Active Micronations Fishy James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Tiana Puggy Puggy 2013-08-04 2014-05-29 1/1/0 Austenasia
Ashukov Federation JosephKennedy JosephKennedy 2014-06-18 2014-06-23 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Adam I of Überstadt Überstadt Überstadt 2014-07-12 2014-07-31 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Democratic Republic of Leylandiistan Leylandiistan Leylandiistan 2015-01-07 2015-05-25 1/1/0 Austenasia
James Stewart FrancisvilleAdmin Sebastian Linden 2016-01-01 2016-02-24 3/3/0 Austenasia
Jonathan I, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Førvania 2016-02-09 2016-05-07 3/3/0 Luxor
Kermadecia DNSgov DNSgov 2016-05-30 2016-06-11
(Later stripped of GA status)
2/2/0 Austenasia
Reylan Imperial Triumvirate Taeglan I Nihilus Kit 2016-06-05 2016-07-24 2/2/0 Austenasia
Deva Victrix Austenasia Austenasia 2016-12-05 2016-12-15 2/2/0 Austenasia
Empire of Pavlov Deniz Deniz 2016-12-15 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Sabia and Verona Ricky Ricky 2016-12-21 2017-01-07 4/4/0 Austenasia
Abeldane Empire MilitarmiaGov Mahuset 2016-12-27 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Florenia Nathan Nathan 2017-01-29 2017-02-20 2/2/0 Austenasia
Democratic Union of British States Bob Christ Bob Christ 2017-05-26 2017-07-05 3/3/0 Austenasia
Empire of Adammia EmperorAdamI EmperorAdamI 2017-07-13 2017-08-01 5/5/0 Austenasia
Abeldane federal election, August 2017 Numerous Ricky 2017-08-31 2017-09-07 4/4/0 Twain
Essian Commonwealth Twain Twain 2017-09-07 2017-09-25 4/4/0 Überstadt
Democratic Duchy of Francisville FrancisvilleArchive FrancisvilleArchive 2018-06-05 2018-07-30 2/2/0 Austenasia
Royal coat of arms of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2018-12-15 2019-01-16 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Florence AnthonyClark AnthonyClark 2018-01-10 2019-02-04
(Later stripped of GA status)
1/1/0 Austenasia
Tsardom of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland 2019-04-02 2019-04-27 3/3/0 Austenasia
Flag Model of Theodian history Swena Swena 2019-05-09 2019-06-18 3/3/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Gradonia William GF Wilson William GF Wilson 2019-08-07 2019-08-20 3/3/0 Austenasia
Principality of New Eiffel Z. Luna Skye MissEDconexion 2019-09-20 2019-10-05 2/2/0 Austenasia
Esmond III, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Malinovia 2019-09-27 2019-10-17 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Eiffel Main Route 1 Z. Luna Skye Z. Luna Skye 2019-11-11 2019-11-20 6/5/1 Austenasia
Adam I, Emperor of Adammia EmperorAdamI NickRandouler 2019-11-12 2019-12-10 3/2/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia 2019-11-13 2019-12-11 2/2/0 Austenasia
Principality of Montescano Deniz Deniz 2019-12-10 2019-12-29 2/2/0 Austenasia
Fifth Aenderian Republic Jaydenfromcanada Jaydenfromcanada 2020-01-02 2020-01-23 9/6/3 Austenasia
Empire of Aenopia Aenopia Aenopia 2020-01-09 2020-02-03 4/1/0 MissEDconexion
Kingdom of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2020-02-10 2020-02-19 4/4/0 Vulture001
New Llandudno Aenopia Aenopia 2020-02-09 2020-02-23 3/3/0 Austenasia
  1. Total/Support/Oppose

Good article authors and nominators

User Authored Nominated
No. Articles No. Articles
Aenopia 2 2
Aldrich Lucas 2 5
AnthonyClark 1 1
Asam79 1
AuburnAttack21 1 1
Austenasia 6 3
Billyneil 1
Bob Christ 1 1
BraydenYates 1
Cajak 4 3
Catherine of Kohlandia 1 1
Deniz 2 2
DNSgov 1 1
Dozzer X 1
EmperorAdamI 2 1
Fishy 2 4
Flandrensis 2 2
Førvania 1
FrancisvilleAdmin 2 1
Havnegade-Amager 1 1
Irojas 1 1
James Wilary 3 9
Jaydenfromcanada 1 1
Jeremy Oakes 1
JosephKennedy 1 1
Kaznia2 1
KingdomOfBaustralia 2 2
Kit 1
Leylandiistan 1 1
Mahuset 1
Malinovia 1
MilitarmiaGov 1
MissEDconexion 1 1
Mokke 1 1
Nabil nordamdie 1
Nathan 1 1
NickRandouler 1
Parker I 1 1
People's Republic of Phokland 1 1
Puggy 1 1
QuentinWyvern 1
Ricky 1 2
Rsmall 1 1
Ramtak619 1
SerCenKing 2
Sebastian Linden 1
SiroccanGov 2 1
Swena 2 1
Taeglan I Nihilus 1
Twain 1 1
Überstadt 1 1
Vitcash 1 1
William GF Wilson 1 1
Z. Luna Skye 2 1


Related articles