MicroWiki

MicroWiki:Good articles

Shortcut:
MW:GA

Good articles are considered to be the best articles on MicroWiki as determined by MicroWiki's editors. Before being listed as a good article, articles must be nominated and voted upon for accuracy, neutrality, comprehensiveness, structure and style. This project is designed to help improve article quality on MicroWiki and reward good article editing and creation. At present, there are 69 good articles out of a total of 26,683 articles in MicroWiki. A small blue symbol (This symbol symbolizes good content on MicroWiki.) on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is of good quality.

Criteria

A good article is one that is:

  1. Well-written: its prose is engaging, coherent, clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. There should be a minimal number of red links.
  2. Comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details, is of substantial length but does not go into unnecessary detail, remaining focused on the main topic.
  3. Accurate: it is well-researched and its claims are verifiable and not in dispute.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Illustrated: it should, where possible, be illustrated with appropriate images with succinct captions.
  6. Well-structured: it should have a concise introduction that summarises the topic and a system of hierarchical section headings with a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.

Process

Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by asking an administrator. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter to deal with objections during the GA process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult the author and/or regular editors of the article prior to a nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

If a nominator feels that an article satisfies all the criteria, the article can be nominated by any user on the nomination page making sure that they provide the title of the article, a link to it and the signature of the nominating user. A user should only nominate one article each month. The article will then be reviewed by the community and voted on over a period of seven days after being nominated, with nominators and authors of the article being encouraged to respond to constructive criticism and to address objections promptly. While the number of votes in support or opposition are the main thing taken into account, the arguments on each side will also be considered. A nomination with several blank "support" votes and only a few "oppose" votes may still be rejected if those "oppose" votes make very good arguments against it. Neither will a simply majority be considered; broad consensus needs to be reached, which will be decided at the discretion of the administrator who closes the vote.

Following the seven day period, an administrator will determine consensus of the community and it will either be approved or rejected. If an article is approved, the community deems that it satisfies the criteria, and it will officially be listed as a Good Article. If an article is rejected, the article does not satisfy the criteria and an explanation of why will usually be provided by the reviewing users. Rejected articles should only be nominated again after one month following the previous nomination, and only if improvements have been made to improve the article since.

In the last week of each month, all Good Articles approved that month or the previous month will be voted on by the community. The approved Good Article with the highest number of votes (with admin consensus providing a deciding vote in the case of a tie) will be Featured on the Main Page for at least the first fourteen days of the new month (the Featured Article for the remainder of the month will be a previously approved Good Article decided by consensus of the admins, to ensure articles are not only ever Featured once).


Template

To use the good article template, add {{GA|revision=123456|date=18 June 2021}} to the top of the article. The correct revision and date are the ones that are most recent, just prior to the article being approved. For help on how to use the template correctly, contact an administrator.

Nominations

2021 New Virginian general election

Nominator: Sertor (Chat) 20:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

A pretty decent election article, no? Sertor (Chat) 20:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT This is a well-written article and deserves GA status.   • Daniel Hamilton • Enquiries • My Work 10:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE has too many red links for this to be called a good article Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE While it is well-written and contains enough graphics, it has a few stubby sections and some sentences that I feel could be worded a tiny bit better (ex. "Initially commanding a majority over the House of Burgesses under the Free Democratic Party (New Virginia) and a short-lived coalition with the New Virginian Patriotic League, the rise of the newly reformed National Party and the emergence of the Commonwealth Whigs diminished this and produced a hung parliament.") Not to mention there are redlinks in a lot of places.   addison (talk) 16:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE per addison Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 20:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Naveria (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE per Jared and Addison   Tucker I, King of Oskonia OH ComL (let's chat!) 22:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I think that I'm gonna have to agree with Addison here.    Logan (Aenopia)   Terry Tibbs talk to me • Look at what I've done.   17:07,
  • SUPPORT This is a very good article and it deserves headline. —Preceding unsigned comment added by President of Republic of Mexican Brazil (talk • contribs)

Reference re inquiry by Ministry of Justice dated 13 May 2021

Nominator: Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Foreign relations of Vishwamitra

Nominator:    • Oritsu.me  • Let's talk here  • Contribs 18:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

It is definitely a well written article exceptionally describing the nation's foreign affairs with every single nation, contains adequate links and references and should definitely be voted in as a GA.

  • SUPPORT Very descriptive and detailed. Isaiah (Chat) 03:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT The current longest article on the wiki. When you look at it, you can tell that the author has put a lot of time and effort into it. StefanSNG 06:38 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT YES YES YES YES! Very well written article and extremely detailed. 100% support. Matt talk ☼ 07:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Pog cameron (talk) 07:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Yes. Just yes. Well detailed, HELLA references and it's had A LOT of time put into it.   • Daniel Hamilton • Enquiries • My Work 09:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Clearly, the article has been worked on a lot. FULL support from me. Sander Koff (talk) 12:08, 30 May 2021 (GMT+2)
  • SUPPORTA well written article with great description Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 04:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Clearly, the article has been worked on a lot full support. User:Grand Duchy of Queensland (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2021 (GMT+7)
  • SUPPORT In full agreement with the others, this is the most detailed on Foreign relations of any micronation on the internet. I am thinking of doing the same format for this article. User:Indradhanush 15:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC+5.5)
  • SUPPORT This is, quite frankly, one of the most comprehensive and detailed articles about a nation's foreign affairs. Worthy of GA status in a real sense. Jayden Dagsa (talk • contribs • uploads) 10:37, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 13:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE This article is far too long to read or navigate comfortably. I'm sorry but the amount of detail it goes into is completely unnecessary. Have those voting in support actually looked through the whole thing? "Nations unilaterally recognized by Vishwamitra" alone is a list of almost every macronation in the world with a large paragraph saying pretty much the same thing next to each and every one. Under "bilateral relations", the section on Karnia-Ruthenia is longer than the "Main Article" it's ostensibly a summary of. This is just far, far too long going into unnecessary, repetitive detail and could be substantially shortened. Austenasia (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT @Austenasia: I have made some changes on the unilateral recognition section; the individual nations have been all put together as Member states of the UN and I hope this makes sense. Still looking forward for those from you and others.    • Oritsu.me  • Let's talk here  • Contribs 18:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I'm going to have to agree with Jon here. Sure, the quality is very good however it is far too long and is more of a list than anything.    Logan (Aenopia)   Terry Tibbs talk to me • Look at what I've done.   15:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Abso-frickin-lutely.   Tucker I, King of Oskonia OH ComL (let's chat!) 15:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Great page and very detailed Sir Archie Birch 23:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Per Jonathan   addison (talk) 01:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • COMMENT A valid point can be raised for the macronational section- spoke to Dhrub about redoing the macronational section into a "dropbox" (seen in the "Participating National Olympic Committees" section of w:2010 Winter Olympics#Participating National Olympic Committees) in hopes of increasing the readability Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 02:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Per Jonathan Sertor (Chat) 12:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I think this article kind of misses the point between readability and detail. While the opening sections contain helpful information and details of how Vishwamitra does it's foreign policy, the tables with descriptions and long histories thereof (including images in them for crying out loud!) do not aid the article's length or readability. Michal Frederick Nowacki, Grand Duke of Litvania 15:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Veri nic Chris
  • SUPPORT This is a great article, rich in information and well articulated. Sildavian Crown and Government (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC−3)
  • SUPPORT One of the best articles on foreign affairs. Karno-Ruthenian Government (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC−3)
  • SUPPORT This is one of the most complete articles in this wiki and the best foreign relations article I've ever seen. Arthur Brum (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE It feels like just a long table.    Cole bairjjf!!1!   bill nye still hasnt replied to me on twitter please reply here bill nye • cole have a life challenge   18:26, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE 3/4ths of it is a long table, wit a LOT of filler.   jonas | talk 17:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Vishwamitra has an excellent presence on this site, with many well developed and frequently updated articles, this is no different. -Emperor Vincent I of Arthuria
  • SUPPORT Naveria (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE long and impressive but lists shouldn't qualify for GA. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 11:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT I like this article because it understands why this country can do with foreign relations Ezri A. 16:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Remove GA Status from Kingdom of Burdette

Nominator: Sertor (Chat) 20:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Problematic issues raised during the initial GA discussion remain unfixed. The article as a whole requires a copyedit, for which the relevant template was removed in an edit war. Several sections such as the Constitutional convention and the First elections are rather poor. Whilst this certainly isn't a poor article, it certainly isn't befitting of good article status.

Sough2020

Nominator:    Logan (Aenopia)   Terry Tibbs talk to me • Look at what I've done.   10:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

I recently nominated this article a few months ago however it unfortunately didn't stand up well to the final vote.

  • SUPPORT It's clear that this article has had a lot of effort put into it. I would go as far as to say this is the best article about a micronational convention on this site. Sections have been well-expanded and the article has sufficient references. This article deserves GA status.   • Daniel Hamilton • Enquiries • My Work 04:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORTThis article is about as good as these type of arcticles can get Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Emperor Anthony I (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Addison Dillon

Nominator:   addison (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure about this one; worth a shot.

Remove GA Status from New Eiffel Main Route 1

Nominator: Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 20:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Feels too stubby to be honest Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 20:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

  • SUPPORTI wonder how this even got good article status Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 04:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Tbf it does fulfill all the criteria. Certainly in regards to being well-written, worse articles have been approved. It's not a stub, either; that's where an article's too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject and is capable of expansion, and I don't think that's the case here. Unless we're saying that some topics simply can't have GA articles written on them (and I'd actually agree with that, but I don't think a geographical feature is one of the those topics), how would you suggest the article be improved to make it GA-standard? It's a garden path; what more is there to write? Austenasia (talk) 06:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Per Jonathan Jayden Dagsa (talk • contribs • uploads) 23:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE I don't why why being stubby would mean being unworthy of GA status. It is a well constructed article. Arthur Brum (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Saspearian Declaration of Independence

Nominator: Emperor Anthony I (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Republic of Matthewopia

Nominator: Matt talk ☼ 00:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Renominating after some improvements, also looking for feedback for how this could be improved. Matt talk ☼ 00:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Principality of Posaf

Nominator: Andrew (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
The article was featured on the home page in honour of Nicholas Randouler, however I feel the quality of the article is good enough to be considered a "good article". Andrew (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT Note I didn't get swayed by Andrew's message in MW@D. It really is fit to be considered a good article. Jayden Dagsa (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT It is indeed a very good article, with a good layout and impressive content. Arthur Brum (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Federal Union of Wegmat

Nominator:    Cole bairjjf!!1!   bill nye still hasnt replied to me on twitter please reply here bill nye • cole have a life challenge   18:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Remove GA Status from Kingdom of Ebenthal

Nominator:   jonas | talk 17:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I am pretty convinced most of the article is false. I will give a quick rundown on why, but I recommend you read through this. One of the old images featured an American Exit Sign. Remember that Ebenthal is located in Brazil. When another user mentioned it, the author of the article had changed the image to something else. Doesn't help that he cleared that section of the talk page.

  • OPPOSE Ebenthal's article is one of the best examples of a well-written article and also one of the few to achieve good article status despite being written by an user of whose English is not the first language. I would request @WeaponizingArchitecture: to simply not contribute highly in criticizing other's works and efforts, but to contribute highly to improve your works which lacks efforts.    • Oritsu.me  • Let's talk here  • Contribs 18:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Again, this matter when ONE guy accused the article of being fake was extensively debated in the discord server after a conflict, it got the attention of three administrators and mods, and it was solved, until you resolved, for whatever reason (which doesn't seems to be an act of good faiht, if one ask me) to dig in the the article's excluded comments (which were excluded following months the matter was settled, for being purposelesly there; If I would hide something, I wouldn't delete it literally 8 months after the matter was solved, would I? Out of nowhere?). I mean, with what purpose dig in if not find hypothetical reasons to mess with the article? I won't discuss the whole RESOLVED affair with that ONE wrong image which was changed precisely for correction and accuracy AGAIN and after DISCUSSION involving administrators Zed and Luxor you are not aware (because it does not concern you) and simply making accusations without knowing the full facts. Honestly, this is getting really tiresome. Based on such accusation, shall I pin articles as dubious when they have no sources or as little as three, four sources? For God's sake... live your own life and leave my micronation alone. Arthur Brum (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Despite the matter being resolved, it's interesting to note the particular judgment of some people and the resources they employ to try to harm other people, even under the guise of improving the site, which the nominator himself doesn't do, as seen in articles that the nominator contributed, as an example, the Co-operative Republic of Wendatia. The criteria that would eliminate the article under analysis would certainly also disqualify the nominator's article; this, of course, if the article was reasonable enough to dispute the Good Article label. The best thing would be, in the first place, to discard this childish attempt to harm other people efforts. Second, should be abolished this opportunity for anyone, without criteria, to decide what suits the site in terms of standard and excellence. It's ok to have a right to indicate articles to be Good Articles, but the decision should be made by minimally qualified people. This privilege MicroWiki has given its users has been used regretfully by some individuals. Karno-Ruthenian Government (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC-3)
  • OPPOSE Ebenthal's article is one of the best articles on the wiki, the best of its own government's knowledge, and in no way should it lose its good article status which has been achieved by its merit of a very well written, articulate and totally truthful article. Sildavian Crown and Government (talk) 15:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC-3)
    • COMMENT @Jaydenfromcanada: Also the photos don't have any metadata. Not to mention that File:Centro_RJ_5.jpg looks pretty photoshopped (The artifaction around the tree and said tree's lighting is pretty unrealistic.) Not to mention that even if someone took the photos for him, they would STILL have metadata. However the pictures do not.   jonas | talk 21:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
      • COMMENT Please take time to find images present in the article to counterparts that may not be in Brazil. So far you have been nitpicking and hencewhy you gotten so much opposes. The text relating to the images is downtown Rio and I don't know about you but that image looks like downtown Rio. Stop nitpicking or else I will start ignoring this case. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 23:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT im gonna be honest, this isn't helping your case either, if all of you have the same excuse of "you're just jealous". Hell, i wasn't even the one who discovered this. That was another user. I think it's just obvious if you actually look at it. And yes, it is a pretty impressive article. But a long article does not excuse it from being dubious.   jonas | talk 03:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Unless nominator provides examples of dubious photos it seems like the article is fine. For example: photo relating to snow in Novesfora relates to "METEOROLOGIA PREVÊ NEVE PARA ITATIAIA, NA DIVISA DE MINAS COM O RIO. Likewise, seat of Minsitry of Foreign Affairs relates to a very similar but different image by Emanuel Pavia, seen here. The photos accused of being dubious are not present in the article. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 04:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT I also find it suspicious that they changed the image 3 times since then, however the caption has remained the same on 2 of the images. For example:
      "Pedro II College noble room, designated as one of the three usable rooms by the Tribune of Truth, along with the UNESA court room and the UFRJ Noble Saloon.[e] These rooms are theorically of free use by alumni. Nonetheless, the Tribune of Truth has never used any of those." was a VERY SIMILAR caption to the previous, with the previous being "Pedro II College conference room, designated as one of the three usable rooms by the Tribune of Truth, along with the UNESA court room and the UFRJ Noble Saloon." It just makes it harder for me to believe the article if they changed the image 3 times and the caption has mostly remained the same for 2 of them.   jonas | talk 12:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
      • COMMENT This claim can't be warranted for removal of one's GA since that can be rendered as an opinion, they don't really relate to an article being dubious or not and we would then have to review all the past GAs for changed images with the same subtitles. My vote will not change until actual proof has been tabled to me. Jaydenfromcanada (talk) | Sent from Mail for Windows 10  whats next requiring a license to make toast in your own toaster | 18:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT are you gonna continue writings walls of text saying the same thing   jonas | talk 03:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT Good enough evidence for what? You are simply ignoring every explanation, you are completelly ignoring the fact that this discussin has already happened before, you are ignoring that this discussion had already been taken to adminship, you are ignoring that there have been a whole talk on this in the Discord server months ago, basing your claim on the deleted talk page which was the beggining for the further discussion which took place at the Discord server, and which was only deleted MONTHS after the matter was solved, because there was no reason to leave it there. And the worse part is that you are cementing your claim to falsity based on a "fake imagem" that is no longer in the article since last year, and, again, ignoring my explanation of why it was there and why it was removed. You are actually ignoring everything to support your narrative, which is clearer now given how you said "the author wiped out", while occulting the facts behind it as I mentioned. Worth notice, you are doing this after, for some reason, give yourself the trouble to check not the article's editing record, but the talk page's editing history/record. I mean, who does this with no purpose? And you stay wanna say that people can't talk of you acting out of jealousy. Why not, when it seems exactly this? Arthur Brum (talk) 00:06, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT @Jaydenfromcanada: The link to the talk page archive has the evidence to back up my claims. Since that area of the talk page got wiped by the author, along with the images in question being changed, i think it's good enough evidence.   jonas | talk 17:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
    • COMMENT And even so, Emmanuel Paiva is a known photographer from Rio de Janeiro who takes photo of every street possible since 2005. He took photos even of my house. Also, about the Itatiaia photo, you can see I've made no false claims since on its description it is written that the photo pre-dates Ebenthal's existence as it is from Itatiaia National Park, where part of Ebenthal came to lay claim later: "Rare occurrence of snow in the geographical region where the city of Novesfora is currently located, pre-dating Ebenthali independence and the city's foundation" is what is written. It wasn't anything like "Photo of Ebenthal in 1984". Furthermore, the one wrong photo which had been PREVIOUSLY on the article was added: 1. when I was creating the article, as a matter of illustration as the article was being created and constantly edited. 2. It was removed upon noticed and substituted correctly and have been unchanged since. an you noticed well, Mr. Jonas wants to remove the GA status of the article over a photo that is no longer present at the article for months, even before the article was nominated for GA status. It makes no sense. Arthur Brum (talk) 12:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT https://micronations.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Kingdom_of_Ebenthal&diff=prev&oldid=688099 evidence given is sufficient of faking of some images. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Naveria (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE Grand Duchy of Queensland (talk) 23:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)(GMT+7)
  • OPPOSE StefanSNG 17:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • OPPOSE As explained by above and also that this article clearly reminds of the standard Wikipedia page of Brazil, in homage to its home country. User:Indradhanush 5:10, 15 June 2021
  • OPPOSE Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 02:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Vlasynian Despotate

Nominator:     Ned Vodă (Talk Contributions) 21:30, 05 June 2021 (UTC)

After several improvements done to Vlasynia's page over the course of several months, I think that it is finally ready to become a good article.     Ned Vodă (Talk Contributions) 21:45, 05 June 2021 (UTC)

Theodian language

Nominator:   User:Indradhanush 2:30, 14 June 2021

One of the original Good Articles of MicroWiki, lost its status during the MicroWiki- MicroWikia transfer mess. Regarding the article, it is the successor of Þeûdspråxa that got stripped of its GA status after popular opinion. It is one of the highest quality page on language in MicroWiki and can be comparable to language pages in Wikipedia.

  • SUPPORT I forgot to write this before but this is a true gem of an article in MicroWiki. User:Indradhanush
  • SUPPORT Chancellor.jaredbarker (talk) 02:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  • SUPPORT This is a really shocking article. Yes, shocking, for the effort put not only onto this, but to create the language and to display it so well, in so many details in an article top-level. Equals, in some aspects even surpass, articles on languages in English wikipedia. Astonishing. Really deserving GA status. Arthur Brum (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Archives

Statistics

Article Author Nominator Nominated Approved Votes[1] Approver
Federal Republic of St.Charlie Cajak Fishy 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status) 		5/5/0 Fishy
Observergate SerCenKing Cajak 2010-09-16 2010-09-27 5/4/1 Fishy
Þeûdspråxa Swena Aldrich Lucas 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later stripped of GA status) 		5/5/0 Fishy
Students' Isocratic Oligarchy of Yabloko Aldrich Lucas Asam79 2010-09-16 2010-09-27
(Later deleted) 		3/3/0 Fishy
Republic of Petorio Ramtak619 Fishy 2010-09-27 2010-10-05 6/4/2 Aldrich Lucas
Cheslovian Federation Kaznia2 Fishy 2010-10-13 2010-10-17
(Later stripped of GA status) 		3/3/0 Aldrich Lucas
Technological Federation of Erephisia Billyneil Aldrich Lucas 2010-12-09 2010-12-15 0/0/0 Aldrich Lucas
Kingdom of Überstadt Überstadt Aldrich Lucas 2011-01-24 2011-01-30 5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Secundomia Parker I Parker I 2011-03-24 2011-04-01 4/3/1 Aldrich Lucas
Republic of Ultamiya AuburnAttack21 AuburnAttack21 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 3/2/1 Aldrich Lucas
MicroWiki Influence Survey Aldrich Lucas Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-12 2011-04-19 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Federated Republics of A1 Fishy Aldrich Lucas 2011-04-14 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
St.Charlie Armed Forces Cajak Fishy 2011-04-17 2011-04-26 2/2/0 Aldrich Lucas
Grand Duchy of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-04-28 2011-05-08 1/1/0 Aldrich Lucas
Nick Maggiore Cajak Cajak 2011-05-30 2011-06-06 13/13/0 Aldrich Lucas
Riley Small Rsmall Rsmall 2011-07-03 2011-07-11 5/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Niels of Flandrensis Flandrensis Flandrensis 2011-07-14 2011-07-22 6/4/1 Aldrich Lucas
Declan I, II & V Austenasia Austenasia 2011-07-16 2011-07-23 8/8/0 Aldrich Lucas
Berinese Confederation Irojas Irojas 2011-07-17 2011-07-24 10/8/2 Aldrich Lucas
Prsänëan Credit James Wilary James Wilary 2011-08-09 2011-08-16 6/6/0 Aldrich Lucas
Heinrich Schneider SerCenKing Cajak 2011-08-29 2011-09-07 7/7/0 Cajak
Flag of Berin Mokke Mokke 2011-09-22 2011-09-29
(Later stripped of GA status) 		5/5/0 Aldrich Lucas
Havnesgade-Amager Havnegade-Amager Havnegade-Amager 2012-04-02 2012-04-09 7/6/1 SiroccanGov
Union of Nemkhav Communists Vitcash Vitcash 2012-04-07 2012-04-14 3/3/0 Fishy
Juclandia Dozzer X Jeremy Oakes 2012-05-08 2012-06-27 4/3/1 Jeremy Oakes
Grand Unified Micronational Austenasia BraydenYates 2012-06-26 2013-01-01 8/7/0 James Wilary
Prsänëan language James Wilary James Wilary 2012-07-28 2013-01-01 7/4/0 James Wilary
Bowie QuentinWyvern Austenasia 2012-12-17 2013-01-01 3/3/0 James Wilary
Federal Commonwealth of Sirocco SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/4/2 James Wilary
National Centre of Computing (Sirocco) SiroccanGov James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Alexander Reinhardt Cajak James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 5/4/1 James Wilary
Empire of Austenasia Austenasia James Wilary 2013-01-02 2013-01-10 6/6/0 James Wilary
Foreign relations of Indokistan Nabil nordamdie James Wilary 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status) 		2/2/0 James Wilary
Yablokogate Numerous SiroccanGov 2013-02-02 2013-02-09
(Later stripped of GA status) 		1/1/0 James Wilary
Inyo, Prsänëa James Wilary James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Organisation of Active Micronations Fishy James Wilary 2013-02-03 2013-02-10 1/1/0 James Wilary
Tiana Puggy Puggy 2013-08-04 2014-05-29 1/1/0 Austenasia
Ashukov Federation JosephKennedy JosephKennedy 2014-06-18 2014-06-23 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Adam I of Überstadt Überstadt Überstadt 2014-07-12 2014-07-31 1/1/0 JosephKennedy
Democratic Republic of Leylandiistan Leylandiistan Leylandiistan 2015-01-07 2015-05-25 1/1/0 Austenasia
James Stewart FrancisvilleAdmin Sebastian Linden 2016-01-01 2016-02-24 3/3/0 Austenasia
Jonathan I, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Førvania 2016-02-09 2016-05-07 3/3/0 Luxor
Kermadecia DNSgov DNSgov 2016-05-30 2016-06-11
(Later stripped of GA status) 		2/2/0 Austenasia
Reylan Imperial Triumvirate Taeglan I Nihilus Kit 2016-06-05 2016-07-24 2/2/0 Austenasia
Deva Victrix Austenasia Austenasia 2016-12-05 2016-12-15 2/2/0 Austenasia
Empire of Pavlov Deniz Deniz 2016-12-15 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Sabia and Verona Ricky Ricky 2016-12-21 2017-01-07 4/4/0 Austenasia
Abeldane Empire MilitarmiaGov Mahuset 2016-12-27 2017-01-07 6/6/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Florenia Nathan Nathan 2017-01-29 2017-02-20 2/2/0 Austenasia
Democratic Union of British States Bob Christ Bob Christ 2017-05-26 2017-07-05 3/3/0 Austenasia
Empire of Adammia EmperorAdamI EmperorAdamI 2017-07-13 2017-08-01 5/5/0 Austenasia
Abeldane federal election, August 2017 Numerous Ricky 2017-08-31 2017-09-07 4/4/0 Twain
Essian Commonwealth Twain Twain 2017-09-07 2017-09-25 4/4/0 Überstadt
Democratic Duchy of Francisville FrancisvilleArchive FrancisvilleArchive 2018-06-05 2018-07-30 2/2/0 Austenasia
Royal coat of arms of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2018-12-15 2019-01-16 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Florence AnthonyClark AnthonyClark 2018-01-10 2019-02-04
(Later stripped of GA status) 		1/1/0 Austenasia
Tsardom of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland People's Republic of Phokland 2019-04-02 2019-04-27 3/3/0 Austenasia
Flag Model of Theodian history Swena Swena 2019-05-09 2019-06-18 3/3/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Gradonia William GF Wilson William GF Wilson 2019-08-07 2019-08-20 3/3/0 Austenasia
Principality of New Eiffel Z. Luna Skye MissEDconexion 2019-09-20 2019-10-05 2/2/0 Austenasia
Esmond III, Emperor of Austenasia Austenasia Malinovia 2019-09-27 2019-10-17 2/2/0 Austenasia
New Eiffel Main Route 1 Z. Luna Skye Z. Luna Skye 2019-11-11 2019-11-20 6/5/1 Austenasia
Adam I, Emperor of Adammia EmperorAdamI NickRandouler 2019-11-12 2019-12-10 3/2/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia Catherine of Kohlandia 2019-11-13 2019-12-11 2/2/0 Austenasia
Principality of Montescano Deniz Deniz 2019-12-10 2019-12-29 2/2/0 Austenasia
Fifth Aenderian Republic Jaydenfromcanada Jaydenfromcanada 2020-01-02 2020-01-23
(Later stripped of GA status) 		9/6/3 Austenasia
Empire of Aenopia Aenopia Aenopia 2020-01-09 2020-02-03 4/3/1 MissEDconexion
Kingdom of Baustralia KingdomOfBaustralia KingdomOfBaustralia 2020-02-10 2020-02-19 4/4/0 Niko3818
New Llandudno Aenopia Aenopia 2020-02-09 2020-02-23 3/3/0 Austenasia
New Leeds Z. Luna Skye Z. Luna Skye 2020-07-23 2020-07-24 3/3/0 Austenasia
Federal Republic of Francisville FrancisvilleArchive FrancisvilleArchive 2020-07-11 2020-09-02 5/5/0 Austenasia
William I of Gradonia William GF Wilson William GF Wilson 2020-09-02 2020-10-01 8/7/1 Austenasia
Kingdom of Ikonia Niko3818 Niko3818 2020-09-02 2020-11-01 3/3/0 Austenasia
State of Vishwamitra Oritsu.me Oritsu.me 2020-11-01 2020-12-01 5/5/0 Ives Blackwood
2020 in the MicroWiki community Z Luna Skye Z Luna Skye 2020-12-14 2021-01-01 3/3/0 Austenasia
Zed Z Luna Skye AgentBro 2020-12-07 2021-02-01 2/2/0 Ives Blackwood
Flag of Australis Australis Australis 2021-02-01 2021-03-01 12/12/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Burdette Isaiah Burdette Isaiah Burdette 2021-02-01 2021-04-01 10/10/0 Austenasia
Kingdom of Ebenthal Grand Duke Arthur Grand Duke Arthur 2021-04-04 2021-05-03 10/10/0 Austenasia
  1. ↑ Total/Support/Oppose

Good article authors and nominators

User Authored Nominated
No. Articles No. Articles
Aenopia 2 2
AgentBro 1
Aldrich Lucas 2 5
AnthonyClark 1 1
Asam79 1
AuburnAttack21 1 1
Austenasia 6 3
Australis 1 1
Billyneil 1
Bob Christ 1 1
BraydenYates 1
Cajak 4 3
Catherine of Kohlandia 1 1
Deniz 2 2
DNSgov 1 1
Dozzer X 1
EmperorAdamI 2 1
Fishy 2 4
Flandrensis 2 2
Førvania 1
FrancisvilleAdmin 3 2
Grand Duke Arthur 1 1
Havnegade-Amager 1 1
Irojas 1 1
Isaiah Burdette 1 1
James Wilary 3 9
Jaydenfromcanada 1 1
Jeremy Oakes 1
JosephKennedy 1 1
Kaznia2 1
KingdomOfBaustralia 2 2
Kit 1
Leylandiistan 1 1
Mahuset 1
Malinovia 1
MilitarmiaGov 1
MissEDconexion 1 1
Mokke 1 1
Nabil nordamdie 1
Nathan 1 1
NickRandouler 1
Niko3818 1 1
Parker I 1 1
People's Republic of Phokland 1 1
Oritsu.me 1 1
Puggy 1 1
QuentinWyvern 1
Ricky 1 2
Rsmall 1 1
Ramtak619 1
SerCenKing 2
Sebastian Linden 1
SiroccanGov 2 1
Swena 2 1
Taeglan I Nihilus 1
Twain 1 1
Überstadt 1 1
Vitcash 1 1
William GF Wilson 2 1
Z. Luna Skye 5 3


Related articles

  Policies and Guidelines of MicroWiki:  
General information:
Disclaimer • Copyrights  • Manual of Style  • Administrators  • Staff  • Basic rules of editing
Policies:
Deletion policy • Blocking policy • Privacy policy
User roles:
Nocats • Patrollers
Guidelines:
Good articles • Featured pictures • Article message boxes • Talk pages • User talk pages
Retrieved from "https://micronations.wiki/index.php?title=MicroWiki:Good_articles&oldid=873280"